California Bar Is Pressed to Grant Diploma Privilege to Law Grads Amid Virus Crisis
The developments put California's committee of bar examiners, volunteers more accustomed to toiling quietly behind the scenes, under enormous scrutiny.
March 30, 2020 at 08:01 PM
4 minute read
After taking public comments for almost three hours Monday, California's committee of bar examiners retreated behind closed doors to consider the fate of the July bar exam as COVID-19 spreads across the United States.
The committee was not expected to emerge from closed session to immediately announce a decision despite the public pleas from more than 50 people, many of them graduating law school students, to grant diploma privilege and allow them to practice law without having taken the bar exam.
New York on March 27 became the first state to officially postpone the July bar exam. Massachusetts announced Monday it will also postpone the exam to an as-yet-undermined date in the fall.
The National Conference of Bar Examiners, which produces the multistate portion of the test, announced Monday it will decide by May 5 whether there will be enough participating jurisdictions and test-takers to hold a July multistate bar exam. The nonprofit said last week that it will offer a separate exam in the fall for jurisdictions that can't or don't want to move ahead with the test in July amid the coronavirus outbreak.
In a letter submitted to California's state bar Monday, hundreds of recent and future law school students called the northeastern states' decision to postpone the exam "a messy alternative."
"The emergency diploma privilege is a superior alternative to postponement because it provides greater certainty and job security for law school graduates and employers and greater choice for clients," the letter said.
Granting graduates freedom from the exam will allow them to immediately go to work helping clients with housing and immigration issues, two areas where the letter-signers said legal need will likely skyrocket in wake of the pandemic.
"Just as our colleagues in medical schools have been called upon to join the front lines fighting COVID-19, so too are attorneys needed to fight for the rights of individuals most affected by this pandemic," the letter said. "We implore California to display leadership during these trying times and pave the way for the timely delivery of legal services."
The developments put California's committee of bar examiners, volunteers more accustomed to toiling quietly behind the scenes, under enormous scrutiny. A conference-call meeting Monday was chaotic, as members of the public shouted to be heard over each other and recorded alerts interrupted whenever someone joined or left the meeting. Some would-be attendees were blocked from the call after it reached capacity.
"This is the most public comment we've ever had," committee chairman Robert Brody said before he and his colleagues moved into closed session to consider options for the July bar exam, including postponement, holding an online exam or granting diploma privilege.
The committee must also decide what to do about two first-year exams, also known as baby bars, scheduled for June and October.
The committee did vote to allow California-accredited law schools to offer pass/fail grades during the 2020 spring and summer semesters as many American Bar Association schools have already done.
Read more:
'The Same, But Different': Learning to Litigate During a Public Health Crisis
Judiciary Endorses Emergency Court Procedures Amid Virus Pandemic
How the COVID-19 Crisis Is Reshaping Alternative Dispute Resolution
Lawyers Watch for Consumer Class Actions as COVID-19 Hits Pocketbooks
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAssessing the Second Trump Presidency’s Impact on College Sports
LSAT Administrator Sues to Block AI Tutor From Using ‘Famous, Distinctive’ Test Prep Materials
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1E-Discovery Provider Casepoint Merges With Government Software Company OPEXUS
- 2How I Made Partner: 'Focus on Being the Best Advocate for Clients,' Says Lauren Reichardt of Cooley
- 3People in the News—Jan. 27, 2025—Barley Snyder
- 4UK Firm Womble Bond to Roll Out AI Tool Across Whole Firm
- 5Starbucks Hands New CLO Hefty Raise, Says He Fosters 'Environment of Courage and Joy'
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250