California Bar Is Pressed to Grant Diploma Privilege to Law Grads Amid Virus Crisis
The developments put California's committee of bar examiners, volunteers more accustomed to toiling quietly behind the scenes, under enormous scrutiny.
March 30, 2020 at 08:01 PM
4 minute read
After taking public comments for almost three hours Monday, California's committee of bar examiners retreated behind closed doors to consider the fate of the July bar exam as COVID-19 spreads across the United States.
The committee was not expected to emerge from closed session to immediately announce a decision despite the public pleas from more than 50 people, many of them graduating law school students, to grant diploma privilege and allow them to practice law without having taken the bar exam.
New York on March 27 became the first state to officially postpone the July bar exam. Massachusetts announced Monday it will also postpone the exam to an as-yet-undermined date in the fall.
The National Conference of Bar Examiners, which produces the multistate portion of the test, announced Monday it will decide by May 5 whether there will be enough participating jurisdictions and test-takers to hold a July multistate bar exam. The nonprofit said last week that it will offer a separate exam in the fall for jurisdictions that can't or don't want to move ahead with the test in July amid the coronavirus outbreak.
In a letter submitted to California's state bar Monday, hundreds of recent and future law school students called the northeastern states' decision to postpone the exam "a messy alternative."
"The emergency diploma privilege is a superior alternative to postponement because it provides greater certainty and job security for law school graduates and employers and greater choice for clients," the letter said.
Granting graduates freedom from the exam will allow them to immediately go to work helping clients with housing and immigration issues, two areas where the letter-signers said legal need will likely skyrocket in wake of the pandemic.
"Just as our colleagues in medical schools have been called upon to join the front lines fighting COVID-19, so too are attorneys needed to fight for the rights of individuals most affected by this pandemic," the letter said. "We implore California to display leadership during these trying times and pave the way for the timely delivery of legal services."
The developments put California's committee of bar examiners, volunteers more accustomed to toiling quietly behind the scenes, under enormous scrutiny. A conference-call meeting Monday was chaotic, as members of the public shouted to be heard over each other and recorded alerts interrupted whenever someone joined or left the meeting. Some would-be attendees were blocked from the call after it reached capacity.
"This is the most public comment we've ever had," committee chairman Robert Brody said before he and his colleagues moved into closed session to consider options for the July bar exam, including postponement, holding an online exam or granting diploma privilege.
The committee must also decide what to do about two first-year exams, also known as baby bars, scheduled for June and October.
The committee did vote to allow California-accredited law schools to offer pass/fail grades during the 2020 spring and summer semesters as many American Bar Association schools have already done.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'No Evidence'?: Big Law Firms Defend Academic Publishers in EDNY Antitrust Case
3 minute readLitigators of the Week: Jeffrey Kessler and Steve Berman Reach a Settlement With the NCAA that Reshapes College Sports
Class Action Lawsuit Targets 40 Private Colleges and Universities Over Alleged Price-Fixing
3 minute readJudge Pauses Landmark $2.75B NCAA Settlement Proposal, Parties to Hash Out More Details
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250