While Local Officials Rush to Address Crowding at Santa Rita Jail, Federal Detainees Linger
As the jail population has been trimmed from more than 2,600 to 2,149 people in custody in two weeks, roughly 400 to 500 people remain at Santa Rita awaiting trial on federal criminal charges with apparently zero releases.
March 30, 2020 at 04:57 PM
4 minute read
Lawyers representing a class of prisoners at the Santa Rita Jail in Dublin, California, on Monday asked federal officials to step up their efforts to reduce crowding at the facility in attempts to limit the spread of COVID-19 among prisoners, staff, and their families. The Alameda County sheriff and local prosecutor's offices have so far released hundreds of inmates to decrease the in-custody population at Santa Rita from more than 2,600 when local "shelter in place" orders went into effect two weeks ago to 2,149 as of Monday morning.
U.S. Magistrate Judge Nathanael Cousins of the Northern District of California, who is overseeing a class action addressing mental health treatment at the facility, and counsel for the prisoners, however, said during a hearing Monday morning in the class action case that they weren't aware of any releases among the roughly 400 to 500 people detained at Santa Rita awaiting trial on federal criminal charges.
"It's very distressing that not one federal detainee has been released from custody," said Rosen Bien Galvan & Grunfeld partner Jeffrey Bornstein, one of the lawyers for the prisoner class. "The federal powers that are have not been able to come together" and act as quickly as local officials, he added.
Cousins, perhaps because of the perspective the class action case has given him to the goings-on at the jail, has taken a proactive approach to addressing COVID-19 issues though his criminal docket. As six Bay Area counties were preparing to implement "shelter in place" policies earlier this month to slow the spread of the coronavirus, Cousins issued a new standing order setting up a procedure in cases he's overseeing to reopen detention hearings "on the basis of the physical and mental condition of the accused," he said.
"This public health crisis is serious and urgent," wrote Cousins, noting that general order only applied to his own criminal docket. "Counsel should not delay in evaluating whether any defendant should have his or her detention hearing reopened."
In the class action case, Cousins offered his assistance in dealing with the ongoing public health crisis in an order issued March 16. "The purpose of this order is not to distract or criticize efforts that are already underway, but to provide one procedural path toward faster, classwide action amid this global and community crisis," he wrote.
On Friday, the lawyers in the class action took Cousins up on his offer. Lawyers for the Alameda County sheriff and local public health officials provided updates on current efforts underway at Santa Rita to prevent an outbreak at the jail and the plaintiffs asked for additional measures and information. The judge called Monday's telephonic hearing on short notice, and the appetite for accurate, up-to-date information about what's going on at the jail was evident with more than 50 participants dialing in, including local and federal public defenders, and individual lawyers with clients in the jail.
Cousins said Monday that judges were deciding on a "case-by-case" basis whether to release detainees under 18 U.S.C. §3142(i), which gives federal judges the authority to order the subsequent release of a prisoner in cases where it's "necessary for preparation of the person's defense or for another compelling reason." In the Northern District, Cousins' magistrate colleague, Thomas Hixon, issued an order releasing Peru ex-President Alejandro Toledo, 74, due to heightened risk posed by COVID-19 due to his advanced age. That decision was upheld by U.S. District Judge Vince Chhabria over objections from federal prosecutors. Toledo, however, was being held in the Maguire Correctional Facility in San Mateo County rather than Santa Rita.
Speaking on behalf of Alameda County officials Monday, Gregory B. Thomas of Burke, Williams & Sorensen, said that the jail had conducted 17 coronavirus tests of prisoners, with seven coming back negative and 10 awaiting results. Thomas said that while the sheriff would release any inmate it was ordered to release, he didn't think there was any need to further decrease the jail's population. Thomas said that it was arguably easier for prison officials to enforce social distancing rules than it would be to ensure that inmates were following the state's guidelines once released.
"While we release anyone we're ordered to release, we believe we can do our job," he said.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllUSPTO Director Kathi Vidal Announces Resignation Ahead of Administration Change
3 minute readFTC Receiver Eyes Fraudulent Messages Ecommerce Company's Clients
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1US Magistrate Judge Embry Kidd Confirmed to 11th Circuit
- 2Shaq Signs $11 Million Settlement to Resolve Astrals Investor Claims
- 3McCormick Consolidates Two Tesla Chancery Cases
- 4Amazon, SpaceX Press Constitutional Challenges to NLRB at 5th Circuit
- 5Schools Win Again: Social Media Fails to Strike Public Nuisance Claims
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250