JAMS Snags a Patent-Experienced Judge From LA Federal Court
Judge S. James Otero, an original member of the Central District of California's patent pilot program, will join the ADR provider May 1.
April 06, 2020 at 07:31 PM
3 minute read
U.S. District Judge James Otero of the Central District of California will be retiring later this month after 32 years on the state and federal bench.
A longtime member the Central District of California's patent pilot program, the 68-year-old judge will join JAMS effective May 1 as a mediator and arbitrator. "I intend to bring my experience in IP and as a state court judge to help resolve complex matters," Otero said by email Monday.
"Given the closure of state and federal courts, the IP legal sector is especially suited to go forward with hearings and mediation in electronic virtual format, until matters settle," he added.
Otero took senior status a little over a year ago and has worked his caseload down from over 400 to under 100. "I did not want to leave my already overburdened colleagues with additional cases," he said. The court reassigned many of the cases that do remain to other judges last week.
Otero's departure will be especially felt in the IP bar. When the Central District launched its Patent Pilot Program in 2012, Otero was one of the original four judges who volunteered to handle extra patent litigation from around the district. In the five years prior to taking senior status he handled about 30 patent cases a year on average.
"We'll miss him as a patent judge for sure," said Maschoff Brennan partner Charles Barquist.
Otero worked in the Los Angeles City Attorney's Office before Gov. George Deukmejian appointed him to Los Angeles Municipal Court in 1988 and then to superior court in 1990. President George W. Bush appointed Otero to the federal bench in 2003.
Barquist remembers litigating one of Otero's first Markman hearings in a mid-2000s case on power amplification technology. "He was fully engaged and really interested," Barquist said.
Irell & Manella partner Morgan Chu litigated one of Otero's last trials, a case over a groundbreaking cancer treatment that resulted in a $750 million jury verdict for Chu's client. "Judge Otero handled complex patent cases with great intelligence, balance and aplomb," Chu said.
Before dismissing the jury in that case, Otero spoke for a few minutes about the patent system. "What was important about the case, I think you saw it, that is all these amazing people from all over the world come to the United States because our system incentivizes these very intelligent people to come here to develop these significant technologies," Otero said. "And it's amazing that when our country was founded, that the issue of patents were placed in the Constitution. Visionaries at the time."
Otero also drew brief notoriety in 2018 when presiding over adult film star Stormy Daniels' suit against President Donald Trump to invalidate a nondisclosure agreement about their affair. Otero dismissed the suit after the president and his adviser Michael Cohen agreed not to seek penalties for violating the deal.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'A Never-Ending Nightmare': Apple Sued for Alleged Failure to Protect Child Sexual Abuse Survivors
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250