Judicial Council Adopts Emergency COVID-19 Rules on Civil Deadlines, Bail
The emergency regulations temporarily restrict eviction proceedings, set a reduced bail schedule, encourage remote appearances for hearings and toll deadlines in civil matters.
April 06, 2020 at 06:41 PM
4 minute read
California's Judicial Council on Monday enacted nearly a dozen hastily crafted rule changes designed to keep as many people as possible out of courthouses while maintaining basic judicial operations as the number of confirmed coronavirus cases in the state surpassed 15,000.
The emergency regulations temporarily restrict eviction proceedings, set a reduced bail schedule, encourage remote appearances for hearings and toll deadlines in civil matters. The changes stem from a March 27 executive order signed by Gov. Gavin Newsom freeing judicial branch leaders from restrictions on setting statewide trial court rules addressing COVID-19.
"Jurists and lawyers have struggled and continue to struggle to balance the health and safety needs of their local communities with the civil and constitutional rights and liberties of individuals and groups," Chief Justice Tani Cantil-Sakauye told an emergency meeting of the Judicial Council.
"Today as part of our ongoing collective efforts to flatten the curve, stem the spread of the virus and assume the responsibility delegated to us by governor Newsom … we seek to address the issues of the faces behind the cases and those that support them seeking relief, resolving disputes or having their voice heard by the court," Cantil-Sakauye said.
The rule changes include:
>> Suspending summons and entries of default in landlord-tenant disputes. New rules will also freeze all actions on judicial foreclosures on mortgages and deeds of trust. The action dovetails with an executive order issued by the governor last month barring the eviction of tenants who cannot pay rent due to pandemic-related reasons. Before Monday's action by the Judicial Council, some courts had halted unlawful detainer matters while others continued to process them.
>> Allowing courts to conduct proceedings through video feed or other remote technology—with the consent of defendants. That caveat drew opposition from some judges and sheriffs who did not want to give defendants the choice of whether to physically appear in court.
Appellate Justice Marsha Slough, chair of the Judicial Council's executive and planning committee, said she had talked with many critics of that language but was unpersuaded to strike the defendant's consent.
"Having the right to do it and being the right thing to do are different things," Slough said. "We are not at the point in time to do away with the rights of a defendant because it would be more expedient."
>> Setting a statewide emergency bail schedule. Cantil-Sakauye had previously recommended that courts reduce bail levels to keep as many defendants as possible out of local jails. This statewide mandate will set bail at $0 for most misdemeanor and lower-level felony offenses.
>> Tolling the statute of limitations for all civil causes of action. Sought by the Consumer Attorneys of California and other groups, the rule will stop the clock on civil matters filed between April 6 and the date 90 days after Newsom lifts the state of emergency related to COVID-19.
The emergency rule also extends the timelines for bringing civil matters to trial by six months.
The Judicial Council's approval of the rules follows its endorsement last month of emergency procedures aimed mostly at criminal proceedings, including delaying the deadlines for arraigning defendants and holding preliminary hearings.
Read more:
Bar Is Pressed to Grant Diploma Privilege to Law Grads Amid Virus Crisis
Pay Cuts, Layoffs, and More: How Law Firms Are Managing the Pandemic
Gig-Worker Classification in the Age of COVID-19
Zoom GC Aparna Bawa Opens Up About Big Gains and Some Growing Pains
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRegulatory Upheaval Is Coming. How Businesses Prepare and Respond Will Separate Winners and Losers
California-Based Portal Crypto Exchange Faces Delaware Investor Class Action
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Nelson Mullins, Greenberg Traurig, Jones Day Have Established Themselves As Biggest Outsiders in Atlanta Legal Market
- 2Immunity for Mental Health Care and Coverage for CBD: What's on the Pa. High Court's November Calendar
- 3How to Support Law Firm Profitability: Train Partners Up
- 4Elon Musk Names Microsoft, Calif. AG to Amended OpenAI Suit
- 5Trump’s Plan to Purge Democracy
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250