LA City Attorney Forces Company Offering 'FDA-Approved' Home COVID-19 Tests to Cease Sales, Pay Refunds
Yikon Genomics Inc. and Brandon Hensinger, the CEO of the Foster City, California-based company, were alleged to have offered an at-home test for the virus behind the global pandemic even though the FDA has so far not approved any such a test.
April 06, 2020 at 04:01 PM
3 minute read
Los Angeles City Attorney Mike Feuer has reached a settlement with a California company accused of advertising and selling an at-home test for COVID-19 despite a lack of approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for any at-home test.
Yikon Genomics Inc. and Brandon Hensinger, the CEO of the Foster City, California-based company, have agreed to cease marketing and selling test kits and to provide full refunds to any consumers who purchased them. According to a complaint filed Friday in Los Angeles Superior Court, Yikon and Hensinger registered the domain "thecoronavirustestkit.com" and advertised a "SARS-COV-2 IgG/IgM Home Screening Kit" for sale for $39 as concerns about the virus increased in the U.S. According to the complaint, the site, which as of Monday afternoon was no longer publicly accessible, claimed that the screening test used a "simple finger stick procedure" to test for COVID-19 antibodies in the bloodstream to detect a current or recent infection of the virus behind the current global pandemic.
"The contagious transmission of COVID-19 is matched only by the infectious spread of confusion, misinformation, and consumer scams and frauds regarding this novel coronavirus," wrote Deputy City Attorney William Pletcher in the complaint filed Friday. "Whenever consumers are motivated in part by fears, they are particularly vulnerable to fraudsters, scammers, and 'snake oil' hucksters and charlatans who prey on those fears to persuade the consumers to seek 'cures,' 'treatments,' and other protections, such as tests," he wrote.
As part of the deal to settle the civil enforcement action, the company and Hensinger stipulated that they had violated California's unfair competition and false or misleading advertising laws by selling and promoting an "FDA-approved, at-home test kit" and agreed to cease selling and promoting the test until receiving FDA approval. The company also agreed to pay a full refund to all customers who purchased the test so far.
Pepper Hamilton partner Allison DeLaurentis in Philadelphia, who represents the company and Hensinger in the matter, on Monday passed along an email statement on their behalf.
"Yikon Genomics is committed to complying with all state and federal laws and regulations regarding the marketing and sale of medical devices," the statement said. "We intend to pursue FDA approval for the market and sale of COVID-19 test kits, which we hope will aid in mitigating this global health crisis."
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSanta Barbara Judge Accused of Moonlighting as Attorney for Secretary/Girlfriend
4 minute readInsurers Dodge Sherwin-Williams' Claim for $102M Lead Paint Abatement Payment, State High Court Rules
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250