Lieff Cabraser Files First Class Action Over Quarantined Grand Princess Cruise Ship
The class action, also filed by Mary Alexander & Associates, joins at least half a dozen individual suits brought by passengers of the cruise, after which 21 people tested positive for the coronavirus and two of them died.
April 08, 2020 at 08:51 PM
3 minute read
The first class action filed over the Grand Princess cruise ship quarantined last month off the coast of California hit the courts on Wednesday, alleging gross negligence in exposing more than 2,000 passengers to the coronavirus.
The class action joins at least half a dozen individual lawsuits already filed against Princess Cruise Lines Ltd. over its handling of the voyage, after which 21 passengers and crew tested positive for the coronavirus and two died.
"Carnival and Princess should simply have told incoming passengers about the known presence of coronavirus on its ships, and the Grand Princess in particular," said Elizabeth Cabraser, of San Francisco's Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, which filed the lawsuit in the Northern District of California with Mary Alexander, of Mary Alexander & Associates in San Francisco. "Instead, because of Defendants' choices, the passengers were led unknowingly onto a ship where they would be unavoidably mingling in close quarters with over 1,000 other people already exposed to and potentially infected with COVID-19."
Princess Cruise Lines said in a statement, "Princess Cruises has been sensitive to the difficulties the COVID-19 outbreak has caused to our guests and crew. Our response throughout this process has focused on the well-being of our guests and crew within the parameters dictated to us by the government agencies involved and the evolving medical understanding of this new illness. We do not comment on any pending litigation."
Last month, Princess Cruise said it would "voluntarily pause global operations" of its 18 cruise ships from March 12 to May 10.
The Grand Princess left San Francisco on Feb. 21 for Hawaii. The lawsuit alleges that Princess Cruise failed to adequately screen passengers and crew, quarantine those with the coronavirus or implement procedures for social distancing and disinfecting. The company also knew that the Grand Princess had sailed from San Francisco to Mexico on an earlier voyage, during which at least three passengers reported COVID-19 symptoms, yet chose to allow 62 of the same passengers and more than 1,000 crew members to remain on board for the Hawaii excursion.
Also, the suit notes, about 700 cases of coronavirus broke out on another of its cruise ships, the Diamond Princess, quarantined off the coast of Japan. Seven of those passengers died, including two before the Grand Princess' departure to Hawaii. Australian authorities also have launched a criminal investigation into another of its cruise ships, the Ruby Princess, which sailed between Australia and New Zealand. More than 600 passengers on that ship have tested positive for the coronavirus, 10 of whom died.
Nine passengers of the Hawaii cruise, all from California, filed the class action against Princess Cruise and its parent company, Carnival Corp., and another subsidiary, Fairline Shipping International Corp. Ltd., the vessel's owner. One of the named plaintiffs was diagnosed and treated for coronavirus.
The suit seeks damages for medical costs and emotional distress, plus punitive damages.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllState Appeals Court Revives BraunHagey Lawsuit Alleging $4.2M Unlawful Wire to China
3 minute readApple Disputes 'Efforts to Manufacture' Imaging Sensor Claims Against iPhone 15 Technology
Lawsuit alleges racial and gender discrimination led to an Air Force contractor's death at California airfield
7 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250