With COVID-19 Cases at Santa Rita Jail on the Rise, Federal Magistrates Reconsider Detention Decisions
"There is no evidentiary, expert witness, or commonsense support for the Government's assessment that Daniels's risk of infection at Santa Rita Jail is 'likely low and manageable.'" wrote U.S. Magistrate Judge Nathanael Cousins. "To the contrary, jails and prisons present extraordinarily dangerous conditions for the spread of the virus."
April 10, 2020 at 12:27 PM
3 minute read
Amid a growing number of cases of COVID-19 diagnosed at Santa Rita Jail in Dublin, California, federal magistrate judges are beginning to reconsider decisions to detain certain defendants pretrial.
The Alameda County sheriff's office reported Thursday that 12 inmates at Santa Rita, California's third-largest jail facility and the fifth-largest in the nation, had tested positive for COVID-19, with six other tests outstanding. The positive tests were up from just one positive inmate test just five days earlier.
U.S. Magistrate Nathanael Cousins cited the increase in cases of infections at the jail Thursday in granting temporary release to Jeremy Daniels, a federal defendant indicted for one count of felon in possession of a firearm and ammunition in December 2019 the judge had previously ordered detained in January.
Cousins, who is also overseeing a separate class action brought on behalf of prisoners at Santa Rita, found that Daniels' obesity, previous head wounds, and post-traumatic stress disorder render him at risk for serious complications if he were to contract COVID-19. Cousins wrote that "unprecedented, extremely serious health risk posed by continued detention, exacerbated by Daniels's health conditions, constitutes a compelling reason for temporary release to a custodian under 18 U.S.C. § 3142(i)," which allows for release of pretrial detainees when necessary to prepare their defense or "for another compelling reason."
Cousins rejected the government's argument that being in jail did not put Daniels at a "meaningfully higher risk" of contracting the virus.
"There is no evidentiary, expert witness, or commonsense support for the Government's assessment that Daniels's risk of infection at Santa Rita Jail is 'likely low and manageable.'" Cousins wrote. "To the contrary, jails and prisons present extraordinarily dangerous conditions for the spread of the virus."
While the Alameda County sheriff and local prosecutor's offices have so far released hundreds of inmates to decrease the in-custody population at Santa Rita from more than 2,600 when local "shelter in place" orders went into effect to 1,979 as of Thursday, the population of federal pretrial detainees has remained relatively steady. Cousins granted one additional temporary release Thursday in the case of another Santa Rita detainee that was originally assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Donna Ryu. U.S. Magistrate Judge Kandis Westmore had a handful of detention hearings on her daily duty calendar for Friday as well.
In Daniels' case, Cousins ordered that the defendant be released on the condition of 24-hour home detention at his fiancé's apartment, which a representative of the court's pretrial services department toured virtually before Cousins' order. Although Cousins had previously found Daniels a danger to the community, the judge said the defendant had good reason to abide by the conditions of his release during the pandemic.
"Not only will Daniels be incentivized to comply with the conditions of his release to temporarily remain out of jail, Daniels is further incentivized to remain in place and avoid social contact lest he contracts COVID-19. These changed conditions mitigate Daniels' risk of danger," Cousins wrote.
Daniels is currently set to return to jail on June 9, but that date is subject to further extension if necessary.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllUSPTO Director Kathi Vidal Announces Resignation Ahead of Administration Change
3 minute readFTC Receiver Eyes Fraudulent Messages Ecommerce Company's Clients
Trending Stories
- 1US Magistrate Judge Embry Kidd Confirmed to 11th Circuit
- 2Shaq Signs $11 Million Settlement to Resolve Astrals Investor Claims
- 3McCormick Consolidates Two Tesla Chancery Cases
- 4Amazon, SpaceX Press Constitutional Challenges to NLRB at 5th Circuit
- 5Schools Win Again: Social Media Fails to Strike Public Nuisance Claims
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250