Judge Seeks to Solve Discovery Spat in Facebook Privacy Suit ... With Zoom
U.S. Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley advocated for informal, virtual face-to-face communication and understanding during these unprecedented times.
April 17, 2020 at 06:49 PM
3 minute read
A federal magistrate judge ordered Facebook and plaintiffs in a proposed class action stemming from the company's Cambridge Analytica scandal to regularly hop on video conference calls to squash an ongoing discovery dispute.
U.S. District Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley of the Northern District of California told Facebook's lawyers from Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher and plaintiffs counsel from Keller Rohrback and Bleichmar Fonti & Auld to meet and confer via video conferencing platform Zoom, not letters or email.
"Going forward I might order this in everything," said Corley during a hearing held via Zoom video conference Friday morning. Corley, who is overseeing discovery disputes in the multidistrict litigation pending before U.S. District Judge Vince Chhabria of the Northern District of California, noted that the method is working very well in the Juul multidistrict litigation, another case in which she is overseeing the discovery process.
In a status report filed Thursday, plaintiffs attorneys raised concerns about discovery of electronically stored information including disagreements over protocol, search terms and potential custodians. Gibson Dunn wrote in the filing that "Facebook has endured an escalating barrage of discovery letters," despite producing more than 250,000 pages of electronically stored information.
To expedite discovery, Chhabria earlier this year ordered Facebook to hand over documents related to inquiries from regulators such as the Federal Trade Commission that investigated claims the social network breached its privacy guidelines when Facebook apps gathered unauthorized data from users indirectly through friends.
The judge said the lawyers' status report was "a bit like two ships passing in the night," and she hopes the informal face-to-face communication will make it so "no one needs to feel like they're chasing the other down or getting bombarded."
Gibson Dunn's Orin Snyder suggested one of the meet and confers be "a cocktail zoom."
"That is an excellent suggestion. I would order that if I could," Corley said.
Cocktails or not, the judge did recommend keeping the Zoom meetings as friendly as possible.
"We're working hard, but we're distracted," she said. "Everyone doesn't know if their law firm is going to be here a year from now, or they have their kids running around behind them and they're trying to homeschool. There are things that are frankly bigger that are happening that we need to be conscious of," she said. "This is an unprecedented time, and we need to be understanding. Keep in mind that everyone is doing their best at this time."
Snyder said that it meant a lot for the judge to tell them they could "chill out a bit," and the judge affirmed that it was OK that Snyder and Gibson Dunn's Joshua Lipshutz were not wearing ties, an outfit choice the two lawyers had emailed about in advance, according to Snyder.
Keller Rohrback's Derek Loeser said, "I was kind of happy to put one on and make this seem like a normal week."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNavigating Twitter's 'Rocky Deal Process' Helped Drive Simpson Thacher's Tech and Telecom Practice
In Lawsuit, Ex-Google Employee Says Company’s Layoffs Targeted Parents and Others on Leave
6 minute readPre-Internet High Court Ruling Hobbling Efforts to Keep Tech Giants from Using Below-Cost Pricing to Bury Rivals
6 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Appellate Division Greenlights State Bar's Leadership Diversity Initiatives
- 2SEC’s Latest Enforcement Actions Fuel Demand for Big Law
- 3Sterlington Brings On Former Office Leader From Ashurst
- 4DOJ Takes on Largest NFT Scheme That Points to Larger Trend
- 5Arnold & Porter Matches Market Year-End Bonus, Requires Billable Threshold for Special Bonuses
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250