How Small Firms Can Weather COVID-19 Without the Paycheck Protection Program
If a law firm was counting on PPP money as a way to cover employee paychecks and can't get the money for whatever reason, it likely means the firm will now need to consider other options to manage cash flow and expenses.
April 17, 2020 at 04:11 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Texas Lawyer
The Paycheck Protection Program (PPP), a $349 billion federal relief program for U.S. small businesses that launched April 3, ran out of money April 15, just 13 days after it started. Many who applied are now left waiting for a lifeline to fund their payroll and avoid layoffs until the economy returns to normal. The government-backed loans, which are forgivable in full or in part if employers use the money to keep employees on the payroll for eight weeks.
The government-guaranteed loans were available on a first-come, first-served basis, but without further funding, these small businesses that have flooded banks with applications won't get any help.
What It Means for You:
Kent Zimmermann, a consultant with the Zeughauser Group, said that if a firm was counting on PPP money as a way to cover employee paychecks and can't get the money for whatever reason, it likely means the firm will now need to consider other options to manage cash flow and expenses.
What You Can Do:
Per Zimmermann:
- Reduce partner draws.
- Delay 2019 distributions to equity partners if they have not yet been fully paid.
- Reduce/defer/eliminate bonuses and merit increases for certain attorneys and staff.
- Institute mandatory reduced workweeks and reduced compensation for certain people.
- Reduce other overhead.
- Negotiate with landlords to defer a portion of rent payments.
- Possibly furlough select staff and maybe attorneys or reducing headcount. For firms that consider headcount reductions, many weigh the possibility of starting with the most chronically underperforming staff and attorneys, people the firm sometimes considered counseling out of the firm even before the crisis.
As The Recorder affilliate The American Lawyer has reported, many larger firms across the country (including several in California) have already taken a number of these measures.
Questions You Should Be Asking:
Per Zimmermann:
- What is the duration of the downturn likely to be based on best available data inside and outside the firm? The Congressional Budget Office says U.S. employment will be at 9% at the end of 2021 and Morgan Stanley sees full recovery not before late 2021.
- What is the likely impact on revenue in 2020 and possibly beyond depending on the firm's mix of work (practices and how they are impacted), clients (industries and degree they are impacted), and geographic focus (and how it is impacted)? Different firms will be impacted differently depending on drivers such as those. Many firms are prudently developing forecasts for revenue based on the best available information and act promptly to develop expense reduction options and scenarios depending on their revenue assumptions, considering the kinds of levers mentioned above.
- Does the firm have plans in place for the reasonable worst case revenue scenario and corresponding expense reduction strategy, as well as for the reasonable best case and most likely case scenarios? Zimmerman said that process should start with developing a revenue assumption and plan for how the firm would remain resilient even if revenue decreases far more than expected.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSo You Want to Be a Tech Lawyer? Consider Product Counseling
Democratic State AGs Revel in Role as Last Line of Defense Against Trump Agenda
7 minute readPa. Judicial Nominee Advances While Trump Demands GOP Unity Against Biden Picks
4 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250