Concertgoers Sue Ticketmaster Over Refund Policy Change Amid Coronavirus
The lawsuit claims Ticketmaster Entertainment Inc. and its parent company, Live Nation Entertainment Co., retroactively changed refund policies in the wake of COVID-19.
April 20, 2020 at 01:55 PM
3 minute read
A San Francisco man who says he had to eat nearly $600 in Rage Against the Machine concert tickets is seeking to represent a class action of would-be concertgoers who have not received Ticketmaster refunds for their postponed events as the entertainment industry complies with coronavirus shelter-in-place orders.
The Gutride Safier law firm in San Francisco, which filed the complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California on Friday, claims Ticketmaster Entertainment Inc. and its parent company, Live Nation Entertainment Co., retroactively changed policies on March 14 to no longer refund postponed events, only canceled ones.
Ticketmaster's original refund policy was a primary reason users have been willing to pay premium prices for tickets and substantial fees directly to the ticket sales company, wrote Gutride Safier's Adam Gutride, Seth Safier and Marie McCrary in the complaint.
"A major component of Ticketmaster's value is that refunds would be available for postponed or rescheduled events. Customers that purchased tickets prior to March 13, 2020, including Plaintiff, relied upon this representation at the time that they purchased tickets from Ticketmaster. This statement was a material term of the purchase contracts," they wrote.
Ticketmaster did not respond to a request for comment Monday morning.
The proposed class action follows a flurry of lawsuits against universities, gyms, airlines and theme parks for failure to refund consumers after closures as a result of COVID-19.
Plaintiff Derek Hansen is suing for breach of contract; conversion; unjust enrichment; false advertising; common-law fraud, deceit or misrepresentation; and unlawful, unfair, and fraudulent trade practices.
Hansen is asking the court to order Ticketmaster to pay damages, as well as refund tickets to postponed concerts purchased before March 30. He purchased tickets to two Rage Against the Machine concerts on Feb. 12 totaling $590. The concerts were "indefinitely postponed."
The complaint asserts that "around 30,000 events have already been postponed as a result of the coronavirus outbreak. By some estimates, consumers have spent more than $1 billion on tickets to disrupted events." The suit also seeks an injunction to prohibit defendants from continuing to engage in advertising and marketing practices alleged to be false, misleading and deceptive.
"Yet, Live Nation's president recently predicted that live events will not occur again until fall 2021 at the earliest," the complaint said.
Gutride Safier did not return a request for comment at the time of publication.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllMeta Seeks Declaratory Judgment in VR Eyewear Tech Patent Infringement Case
Plaintiffs Seek to Avoid Jurisdiction Fight in IVF Case, Challenge CooperSurgical in Connecticut
4 minute readPorsche's Venture Capital Arm Adds General Counsel From Clifford Chance
Trending Stories
- 1The Growing PFAS Morass: Why Insurance Should Cover These Products Liability Claims
- 2Dallas Jury Awards $98.65M in Botham Jean Killing by Dallas Officer
- 3In Talc Bankruptcy, Andy Birchfield Skipped His Deposition. Could He Face Sanctions?
- 4Pharmaceutical Patents: Benefits and Challenges
- 5Where Do Web-Tracking Class Actions Belong? 8th Circuit Weighs the Issue
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250