UC Law Schools Among Those Facing Financial Fallout From COVID-19
The University of California system, the University of Arizona, Harvard University and the University of Michigan are projecting massive budget shortfalls, and law schools are feeling the impact.
April 23, 2020 at 01:54 PM
6 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Pay cuts, salary freezes and furloughs are hitting law schools as university systems grapple withmassive budget shortfalls caused by the coronavirus pandemic.
The University of California system, which has 10 campuses and five law schools, has asked state lawmakers for additional funding, saying it racked up $558 million in unexpected expenditures in March alone. Students canceling housing and dining contracts, the costs of switching to online learning, funding COVID-19 research activities, and the halting of elective surgeries all have contributed to the financial shortfall. But system leaders have said they hope to avoid layoffs.
The University of Arizona this week said it's facing a potential $250-million shortfall and is instituting a series of furloughs and salary cuts—which law dean Marc Miller on Thursday said will apply to the law school.
Harvard Law School dean John Manning told students April 14 that he is taking a pay cut and that the law school is freezing pay and hiring. That news came after Harvard president Lawrence Bacow and other top campus leaders at Harvard reduced their salaries by 25% and said the deans of the university's 12 programs could either reduce their pay or contribute to a support fund for Harvard employees facing hardship.
The University of Michigan president Mark Slissell said this week that administrators are anticipating COVID-19-related losses ranging from $400 million to $1 billion through the end of the calendar year. The university has imposed a hiring and salary freeze, as well as voluntary staff furloughs and reduced hours.
"It looks to me like university systems far and wide are facing similar challenges," Miller said. "The [University of Arizona] was early, but it's already not alone."
Miller declined to discuss the details of how the furloughs and pay cuts will impact the law school, in part because that is still being worked out. But a university website states that employees making $150,000 or less will be furloughed for different amounts of time, resulting in pay reductions of 5-15%. Employees with salaries $150,000 to $200,000 will see a pay cut of 17%, with those earning more seeing a cut of 20%. The changes go into effect May 11 and continue through June of 2021.
Law schools have dealt with financial problems before, most recently in the aftermath of the 2008 recession, when enrollment fell 29% nationwide between 2010 and 2015. (Law school enrollment actually increased the first two years after that economic downturn began as graduating college students waited out a rough job market.)
But the coronavirus pandemic is a financial crisis of a different nature. Universities suffered declines in the value of their endowments and added fundraising challenges in the wake of Great Recession, yet many were still able to prop up their struggling law schools in subsequent years with infusions of funding. That's not likely to be the case this time around with university systems reporting such staggering losses.
On the other hand, the economic recovery is expected to be quicker this time around, once people can return to work, noted former University of North Carolina law professor Bernie Burke, who studies the economics of legal education. And law schools may actually see a bump in applicants the next two years just as it did in 2008, because college graduates have fewer employment prospects at the moment. If courses remain online in the fall, however, that could dissuade some applicants from enrolling, he added.
"In the short-term, going to professional school—be it business school, law school or something else—is a good idea because it's a refuge from an inhospitable job market, and the job market will be better three years from now," Burke said. "And I believe the legal job market will be better. It's going to be very bad this fall, and then it will improve."
But Harvard's Manning wrote in his email to students that the financial fallout of the pandemic on the wider university is expected to be bigger than that of the earlier recession. The outbreak is putting pressure on the university's endowment, on philanthropy, on tuition revenue and research support, he wrote. Still, the law school plans to focus its resources on financial aid, Manning wrote.
"As was the case with the 2008-2009 financial downturn, we will continue to make financial aid a top priority as we strive to promote broad accessibility of legal education," Manning wrote. "We will strive to limit impacts on our workforce, who make it possible for us each and every day to fulfill our mission."
When COVID-19 first came to the United States, most law deans and higher education administrators initially focused on the safety of students, faculty and staff, and then whether they could quickly and effectively deliver coursework online. Soon after that, it became apparent that the pandemic was going to have a big—and long-term—negative impact on budgets, said Arizona's Miller.
"That was the start of this very serious conversation about, 'What if this goes on over time? What if it affects the economy severely? What if it limits movement?'" he said. "Early on, we and others began saying, 'Hmm, this is different.'"
Miller believes that large, public research universities like the University of Arizona will be hit the hardest by budget shortfalls. Those campuses are heavily dependent on undergraduate tuition from nonresident and international students, and the pandemic looks likely to prompt many students to stay close to home next year, even if travel opens up. Plus, those large universities face losses from athletic programs, reduced state funding and the possible decline in research funding.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSome Elite Universities Favor Wealthy Students in Admissions Decisions, Lawsuit Alleges
5 minute readHow Uncertainty in College Athletics Compensation Could Drive Lawsuits in 2025
'Basic Arithmetic': Court Rules in Favor of LA Charter School Denied Funding by California Education Department
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250