COVID-19 Drives Federal Lobbying for California Companies and Agencies
First-quarter disclosures show dozens of Golden State corporations, cities, transit districts, hospitals and trade groups lobbied on matters related to the coronavirus pandemic.
April 24, 2020 at 04:24 PM
3 minute read
As the novel coronavirus spread and the economy tanked this spring, Uber Technologies Inc. turned to federal lobbyists for help.
At the start of the year, the ride-hailing giant already had a fleet of outside advocates in Washington, D.C., including Mayer Brown and Invariant. But on March 18, the same day the Dow Jones dropped 6% and erased nearly all Trump-era gains, Uber started a new lobbying relationship with Forbes Tate Partners.
The sole lobbying targets listed on Uber's lobbying registration form were three congressional bills promising $2 trillion in COVID-19 relief.
Uber wasn't the only California company looking for its share of coronavirus help on Capitol Hill. First-quarter disclosures show dozens of Golden State corporations, cities, transit districts, hospitals and trade groups lobbied on matters related to the pandemic.
Airbnb, whose hosts have watched their bookings evaporate, spent tens of thousands of dollars lobbying on "provisions related to individual and business relief measures." Fulcrum Public Affairs and Kountoupes Denham Carr & Reid got some of the company's lobbying work.
Lyft, Instacart and TaskRabbit lobbied for help, too, even though their workers, classified as independent contractors, would not typically qualify for unemployment assistance. Alphabet's Google, Gap Inc., PayPal and Aerojet Rocketdyne lobbied to shape the federal response.
But it wasn't just the big blue-chip companies. The Autry Museum of the American West in Los Angeles, currently closed to the public, lobbied on the CARES Act, which ended up including help for museums nationally. The Marine Mammal Center in Sausalito sought funding for emergency rescues during the COVID-19 shutdown. Even Playboy Enterprises paid for lobbying help on "issues related to COVID-19 legislation."
Bioscience and pharmaceutical companies jumped into the lobbying frenzy, too. Kahala BioSciences, an Irvine-based COVID-19 testing company, retained Forbes-Tate on March 13. Primmune Therapeutics, a San Diego firm working on a treatment for the virus that causes COVID-19, followed suit six days later when it also hired Forbes-Tate.
Cities of all sizes, counties, transit agencies and water districts all sought a piece of the relief pie, too, the lobbying records show. The California Assembly, currently in a pandemic-driven recess, also listed "COVID Response" among its first-quarter federal lobbying targets.
Most of the California clients already had existing contracts with lobbying firms. But the novel coronavirus has been a significant source of new work for Capitol Hill lobbyists. Firms registered activity for more than 140 new clients from all states on issues related to COVID-19 between mid-March and mid-April, according to the Center for Responsive Politics.
Big Law lobbying practices in the top 10 by revenue last quarter each saw gains from the same period last year, according to ALM affiliate The National Law Journal. For the two revenue leaders, the year-over-year gains were substantial: 31% for Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld, which pulled in $12.6 million, and 25% for Brownstein, Hyatt, Farber & Schreck, with $11.5 million.
"There was some conventional wisdom coming out from last fall that suggested during a presidential election year, everything would seize up," Brownstein partner Marc Lampkin, who leads the firm's Washington, D.C., office, told the NLJ. "Then COVID-19 comes along and deepens the attention and focus on policy makers. It certainly created an opportunity for lobbying firms and practitioners."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllVisa CLO-Turned-Vice Chair Seeing Payoff From Expanded Role
Stock Trading App Robinhood Hit With Privacy Class Action 1 Month After Alleged Data Breach
Congress and Courts Are Considering Litigation Financing: Is Disclosure Imminent?
8 minute read'A World of Credit': Ex-FTX Executive Gary Wang Sentenced to Time Served Following Cooperation
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Ruling Provides Lessons for Investors: Mind Your Business (Affairs)!
- 2With SDNY Stay Lifted, Sex Trafficking Civil Suit Against Vince McMahon, WWE Gets Green Light
- 3Insurer Has No Duty to Defend 'Laidlow' Claims, NJ Supreme Court Says
- 4The Marble Palace Blog: The Supreme Court’s Bond With Baseball
- 5Meet the Big Law Partners Advising Political Appointees
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250