In Good Hands? Elon Musk Provides Tesla's Directors and Officers Liability Insurance
To what extent, if any, Tesla's legal department was involved in advising Musk on the insurance decision was unclear.
April 28, 2020 at 04:19 PM
3 minute read
When Tesla Inc. determined that its directors and officers liability insurance policy was too expensive, CEO Elon Musk made the relatively unusual decision to step in and personally provide coverage.
Tesla disclosed the arrangement Tuesday in a 10-K/A filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Attempts to speak with a company representative were not immediately successful.
To what extent, if any, Tesla's legal department was involved in advising Musk on the insurance decision was unclear. But the company has apparently been without a named general counsel since Jonathan Chang exited in late 2019. He was the third Tesla GC to depart within a year.
"I've never heard of anything like this before," said Ed Ryan, former general counsel of Marriott International Inc.
Asked what advice he'd give, as a general counsel, to a CEO who was considering providing D&O insurance, Ryan said:
"I'd say, 'Well, the directors have to sign off on it but, just to begin with, it's a transaction where I'm not representing you, Elon Musk. I'm representing the company and its directors. If you want us to treat you as the insurer in some unrelated party deal, if we can get over the fact that the CEO is our insurer, we have to look at you as: Do you have the capacity? What are the limits? And what backstops are there to make sure everyone is protected?'"
In its SEC filing, Tesla stated that it opted against renewing its D&O policy for the 2019-2020 year "due to disproportionately high premiums quoted by insurance companies.
"Instead, Elon Musk agreed with Tesla to personally provide coverage substantially equivalent to such a policy for a one-year period, and the other members of the board are third-party beneficiaries thereof," Tesla stated.
The company added, "The board concluded that because such arrangement is governed by a binding agreement with Tesla as to which Mr. Musk does not have unilateral discretion to perform, and is intended to replace an ordinary course insurance policy, it would not impair the independent judgment of the other members of the Board."
Musk shouldn't have any trouble covering the insurance premiums. Reuters reported Tuesday that he stands to receive about $750 million from stock options as shares of Tesla rebounded based, at least in part, on anticipation of the company reopening its automotive plant in Fremont, California.
The factory had been shuttered as a result of the COVID-19 outbreak.
"His net worth is probably enough," Ryan said of Musk's ability to provide liability coverage to Tesla's directors and officers. "But you've gotta make sure that it's set aside. When D&O typically comes into play, something terrible has happened to the company. And I don't know what that net worth is at the time."
Read More:
Tesla's 3rd General Counsel in a Year Leaves for Artificial Intelligence Company
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCleary Nabs Public Company Advisory Practice Head From Orrick in San Francisco
Morgan Lewis Shutters Shenzhen Office Less Than Two Years After Launch
Trending Stories
- 1How ‘Bilateral Tapping’ Can Help with Stress and Anxiety
- 2How Law Firms Can Make Business Services a Performance Champion
- 3'Digital Mindset': Hogan Lovells' New Global Managing Partner for Digitalization
- 4Silk Road Founder Ross Ulbricht Has New York Sentence Pardoned by Trump
- 5Settlement Allows Spouses of U.S. Citizens to Reopen Removal Proceedings
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250