Chief Justice Authorizes Additional Delays in Criminal Trials
The extension is not a mandate. It allows delays but encourages lawyers to work together to proceed with criminal trials at a sooner date.
April 29, 2020 at 06:42 PM
3 minute read
Chief Justice Tani Cantil-Sakauye issued a new statewide order Wednesday that could delay some criminal trials until as late as mid-September.
The order tacks on an additional 30 days to the chief justice's March 23 order, which suspended jury trials in California for 60 days. The new directive does not address civil proceedings.
The extension is not a mandate. It allows delays but encourages lawyers to work together to proceed with criminal trials at a sooner date "if a court may do so in compliance with applicable health and safety laws, regulations, and orders, including through the use of remote technology, when appropriate."
Wednesday's order is the third statewide directive issued by the chief justice in the last four weeks as courts grapple with the impacts of the novel coronavirus. It comes as additional trial courts eye partial reopenings in the coming weeks and leaders fear a tidal wave of restarted proceedings.
"The continuous operation of our courts is essential for our constitutional form of government, and for providing due process and protecting the public," the order said. "However, courts are clearly places of high risk during this pandemic because they require gatherings of judicial officers, court staff, litigants, attorneys, witnesses, defendants, law enforcement, and juries—well in excess of the numbers allowed for gathering under current executive and health orders."
The chief justice's order applies to criminal trials that started and were continued or were scheduled to start between March 16 and June 15. That means a trial that was statutorily required to start by June 15 can now be delayed until Sept. 13.
The order allows leaders of trial courts to ask for additional deadline extensions but only if they provide the specific facts in play and explain the steps they're taking to avoid additional delays.
Courts around the state have taken different approaches to conducting essential services during the pandemic. Cantil-Sakauye has signed more than 130 emergency orders for individual trial courts and courts of appeal authorizing everything from extensions of statutory deadlines to holding proceedings in remote locations.
Some courts have announced plans to resume normal operations in the coming weeks. Others are closed indefinitely or are sharply curtailing proceedings. El Dorado County Superior Court announced Tuesday that it is vacating all civil trials scheduled for the year "because it is anticipated that there will be a large volume of criminal trials which will have statutory priority."
Some courts are livestreaming hearings and requiring court visitors to wear face coverings. Others are not.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllInvoking Trump, AG Bonta Reminds Lawyers of Duties to Noncitizens in Plea Dealing
4 minute readCalifornia's Chief Justice Starts Third Year With Questions About Fires, Trump and AI
4 minute readWillkie Farr & Gallagher Drives Legal Challenge for Uber Against State's Rideshare Laws
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Paul Hastings, Recruiting From Davis Polk, Continues Finance Practice Build
- 2Chancery: Common Stock Worthless in 'Jacobson v. Akademos' and Transaction Was Entirely Fair
- 3'We Neither Like Nor Dislike the Fifth Circuit'
- 4Local Boutique Expands Significantly, Hiring Litigator Who Won $63M Verdict Against City of Miami Commissioner
- 5Senior Associates' Billing Rates See The Biggest Jump
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250