Campaign to Lift Medical Malpractice Cap Punts Ballot Measure to 2022
"It will be more productive to have this conversation when everything stabilizes," ballot measure proponent Scott Olsen said.
April 30, 2020 at 05:32 PM
3 minute read
Authors of an initiative that would raise California's $250,000 cap on medical malpractice awards say they're dropping efforts to qualify for the November 2020 ballot and will instead target the 2022 general election.
Backers of the measure, including plaintiffs lawyer Nicholas Rowley, a partner at Carpenter Zuckerman & Rowley, say they've collected 988,000 petition signatures. The number, if a high percentage of signatures are valid, would be more than enough to qualify for the November ballot. But advocates say waiting until 2022 will give them more time to get the signatures to elections officials.
"Voters are overwhelmed with trying to keep their families safe and deal with the economic impacts of COVID-19," said measure proponent Scott Olsen. "It will be more productive to have this conversation when everything stabilizes."
The initiative, pushed by Rowley, Santa Monica-based Consumer Watchdog and the families of injured patients, would lift the ceiling on noneconomic damages in medical malpractice cases to $1.2 million while tying the limit to the inflation rate for regular increases.
Judges and juries would be allowed to award damages above the cap in cases involving "catastrophic" injuries and death. And the measure would disallow evidence of collateral sources of victim support, such as insurance policies, and end mandatory periodic payments to plaintiffs.
Plaintiffs attorneys and victims have tried to eliminate or raise the $250,000 cap since it was enacted in 1975 with no success. A plaintiffs bar-backed initiative to overturn the Medical Injury Compensation Reform Act, or MICRA, lost overwhelmingly on the 2014 ballot amid $58 million in opposition spending by insurers and medical trade groups.
The main state lobby for trial lawyers, the Consumer Attorneys for California, never endorsed the initiative and said any changes to MICRA should be initiated in the Legislature.
Plaintiffs attorneys were hoping Gov. Gavin Newsom would be more receptive to raising or eliminating the cap than his predecessor, Jerry Brown, who did not support MICRA amendments. The 2020 legislative session has been largely curtailed, however, by absences due to the coronavirus pandemic and an expected plunge in state revenues. Medical malpractice caps are not expected to be part of state budget discussions or legislative efforts this year.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSpaceX Sues California Coastal Commission, Alleging Political Bias Against CEO Elon Musk
Judge Cites 'National Outrage' in Upholding State AG Claims Against Meta
5 minute readUS Supreme Court Won't Hear Challenge to California's Worker-Misclassification Law
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1The Law Firm Disrupted: Playing the Talent Game to Win
- 2A&O Shearman Adopts 3-Level Lockstep Pay Model Amid Shift to All-Equity Partnership
- 3Preparing Your Law Firm for 2025: Smart Ways to Embrace AI & Other Technologies
- 4BD Settles Thousands of Bard Hernia Mesh Lawsuits
- 5A RICO Surge Is Underway: Here's How the Allstate Push Might Play Out
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250