California Supreme Court Won't Open Jail Doors, but Says Local Courts Have Options
"The time-sensitive nature of this crisis—and it is a crisis—makes this disappointing," Peter Eliasberg, an attorney for the ACLU of Southern California representing the petitioners, said.
May 04, 2020 at 06:44 PM
3 minute read
The California Supreme Court on Monday denied a petition by criminal defense organizations seeking the release of county jail inmates and juvenile detainees to minimize the spread of COVID-19.
Still, the justices said the petitioners had raised issues that "call for prompt attention in a manner that considers the diversity of local conditions." The justices laid out a roadmap for trial courts to follow in considering pleas to reduce inmate populations.
A trial court could "consolidate the action with any similar actions pending in the court" or "transfer and consolidate matters across counties" or even "assign a single bench officer or appoint one or more referees or special masters to bring swift and focused attention to the issues raised," the justices wrote.
"In all such matters, the superior court is to proceed as expeditiously as possible and to be mindful that conditions associated with COVID-19 in detention facilities and local communities are continually evolving," the justices said Monday. The petitioners could file similar claims in the state Supreme Court "if circumstances warrant."
Peter Eliasberg, an attorney for the ACLU of Southern California representing the petitioners, said there's no guarantee that a trial court will consolidate matters or take any actions quickly.
"The time-sensitive nature of this crisis—and it is a crisis—makes this disappointing," Eliasberg said.
A spokesman for petitioner National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers said in an email that the organization is "studying the decision." California Attorneys for Criminal Justice and Youth Justice Coalition joined the NACDL on the petition.
The petitioners were represented by attorneys from Munger, Tolles & Olson and the American Civil Liberties Union.
Attorneys for Gov. Gavin Newsom and Attorney General Xavier Becerra said local officials overseeing the jails have the responsibility to fix any problems contributing to the spread of COVID-19 and that conflicts over such issues are best handled by local trial courts.
County jails and state prisons have become hotspots for the novel coronavirus in some regions. Two Riverside County jail inmates died of COVID-19-related complications over three days last month, according to the Los Angeles Times. As of April 29, 141 inmates had tested positive for the virus. Two Riverside County sheriff's deputies have died from COVID-19, including one who worked at a detention center.
Newsom ordered the prison system to stop admitting new inmates in an effort to slow the spread of the virus in state facilities. The Judicial Council last month attempted to reduce the flow of new inmates to county jails by enacting a $0 bail policy for many offenses.
Some sheriffs and prosecutors have balked at the efforts to reduce detentions, citing a concern for public safety.
Read more:
'How Do We Exit?' Judicial Council Leader Ponders Post-Pandemic Operations
Northern District of California Courthouses Will Remain Closed Until June 1
How COVID-19 Is Impacting California Courts: Roundup of Services
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFresh lawsuit hits Oregon city at the heart of Supreme Court ruling on homeless encampments
4 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250