Thomson Reuters Accuses Ross Intelligence of Using Bot to Hijack Westlaw Data
The lawsuit against San Francisco-based Ross Intelligence could outline the often adversarial coexistence of copyrights and artificial intelligence.
May 06, 2020 at 12:50 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
(Photo: Diego M. Radzinschi/ALM)
Thomson Reuters is accusing San Francisco-based legal research competitor Ross Intelligence of using artificial intelligence to scrape proprietary data out of its Westlaw database.
With the help of bots and AI, it's never been easier to infringe massive amounts of copyrighted materials, and the lawsuit could underline the challenges of protecting copyrights as AI evolves.
Thomson Reuters claims Ross Intelligence worked with third-party LegalEase Solutions to copy Westlaw content en masse in order to "rush" development of a competing web-based legal product.
The lawsuit was filed Wednesday in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware.
"It is clear that by copying the copyright-protected Westlaw content—piggybacking off of the creativity, countless hours, and extraordinary expense that have gone into creating Westlaw—Ross drastically sped up its development time and reduced the cost associated with the development of its competing platform," wrote Reuters' Kirkland & Ellis and Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell counsel.
Ross Intelligence and LegalEase did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Reuters asserts that Ross began copying the information from LegalEase in July 2017, after Westlaw explicitly denied access to the competitor. "The net result is that plaintiffs are now being put in the unfair position of having to compete with a product that they unknowingly helped create," wrote the media conglomerate's lawyers, led by Kirkland's Dale Cendali.
➤➤ Sign up for the What's Next newsletter here to keep up with the latest developments affecting the future of law.
An investigation showed that, in 2017, LegalEase's Westlaw transactions jumped from 6,000 per month to 236,000 transactions per month and that the company was using software or a bot to systematically download and store Westlaw's West Key Number System, a proprietary hierarchy the company uses to organize its U.S. law content, according to the filing.
In addition to copyright infringement, Reuters is suing Ross for tortious interference with a contract. "Ross committed direct copyright infringement by reproducing and creating a derivative work based on plaintiffs' content, and is also secondarily liable for LegalEase's copyright infringement," the complaint contends.
The company is asking the court to order the removal and destruction of Westlaw content from the Ross platform and require its competitor to report on the profits, gains, advantages and value of business as a result of the alleged infringement.
Thomson Reuters did not return a request for comment at the time of publication.
Read the complaint:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
State Appeals Court Revives BraunHagey Lawsuit Alleging $4.2M Unlawful Wire to China
3 minute read
Apple Disputes 'Efforts to Manufacture' Imaging Sensor Claims Against iPhone 15 Technology
Lawsuit alleges racial and gender discrimination led to an Air Force contractor's death at California airfield
7 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Some Thoughts on What It Takes to Connect With Millennial Jurors
- 2Artificial Wisdom or Automated Folly? Practical Considerations for Arbitration Practitioners to Address the AI Conundrum
- 3The New Global M&A Kings All Have Something in Common
- 4Big Law Aims to Make DEI Less Divisive in Trump's Second Term
- 5Public Notices/Calendars
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
