California Bar Exam Pass Rates Drop to All-Time Low 26.8% on February Test
The results, announced Friday night, come as bar officials are planning next week to give the California Supreme Court a plan for administering the September exam.
May 08, 2020 at 09:33 PM
3 minute read
The percentage of would-be lawyers who passed California's February 2020 bar exam plummeted to a historic low with fewer than 3 in 10 test-takers posting a passing score, according to figures released by the state bar Friday night.
Just 26.8% of the 4,205 applicants who completed the test passed. That's the lowest success rate recorded in California since at least 1951, the oldest figures provided by the bar.
"We heartily congratulate the 1,128 applicants who passed the general bar exam and the 163 candidates who passed the attorney's exam," Donna Hershkowitz, the bar's interim executive director, said in a prepared statement. "Meanwhile, we are moving forward on both near-term and long-term efforts that will affect the future of the bar exam."
On Monday, Hershkowitz said, the bar will give the California Supreme Court a plan for administering the September exam, which justices have called to be delivered online. Bar leaders also are studying the exam for possible changes in future content.
The February 2020 exam pass rate fell below what was then the historically low figure of 27.3% tied to the February 2018 test. The pass rate had climbed to 31.4 percent a year ago, offering hope that California's slumping scores were over.
But pass rates have dropped across the nation this spring. The national average score on the multistate bar exam—the 200-question multiple-choice portion of the attorney licensing test—fell 1.4 points from the previous year. according to the National Conference of Bar Examiners, which develops the test. That represents the lowest average February MBE score on record.
The mean scaled MBE score on the February 2020 bar exam in California was 1357, down from 1370 last year.
Virginia's February 2020 pass rate fell to 58%, down from nearly 63% the previous year. In New York, the pass rate dipped from 45% in February 2019 to 40% one year later. Pennsylvania saw the percentage of successful test-takers dropped, too, from 60.2% to 52.2%.
Florida was an outlier, seeing an increase from 58% in 2019 to 60% this February, while Tennessee's February pass rate held steady at 46%.
First-time test-takers from out-of-state, American Bar Association-accredited law schools posted a better pass rate than their California counterparts, 45% to 42%.
The names of those who passed the February exam will be posted Sunday at 6 a.m.
Read more:
California Postpones Bar Exam Until September, Pushes for Online Test
UC Law Schools Among Those Facing Financial Fallout From COVID-19
Law Deans Ask California Justices to Provisionally License Students
Postpone July Bar Exam or Cancel It, State Bar Tells Calif. Supreme Court
'Please Offer an Alternative Pathway': State Bar Gets Earful Amid COVID-19 Crisis
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBuchalter Hires Longtime Sheppard Mullin Real Estate Partner as Practice Chair
Freshfields Hires Ex-SEC Corporate Finance Director in Silicon Valley
Holland & Knight Hires Former Davis Wright Tremaine Managing Partner in Seattle
3 minute readPaul Hastings Hires Music Industry Practice Chair From Willkie in Los Angeles
Trending Stories
- 1We the People?
- 2New York-Based Skadden Team Joins White & Case Group in Mexico City for Citigroup Demerger
- 3No Two Wildfires Alike: Lawyers Take Different Legal Strategies in California
- 4Poop-Themed Dog Toy OK as Parody, but Still Tarnished Jack Daniel’s Brand, Court Says
- 5Meet the New President of NY's Association of Trial Court Jurists
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250