'Inhumane' and 'Appallingly Cruel': Judge Criticizes Federal Prosecutor's Compassionate Release Waiver in Plea Agreement
"Why would federal prosecutors exercise the tremendous discretion entrusted to them with such a lack of compassion?" wrote U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer in rejecting a plea agreement that delayed when the defendant could ask for compassionate release. The region's top prosecutor said the Northern District of California U.S. attorney's office had changed its model plea agreement in a way that would allow such requests prior to the judge's order.
May 11, 2020 at 05:08 PM
5 minute read
A federal judge in San Francisco has called out the local federal prosecutor's office for asking a criminal defendant to narrow the conditions in which he can ask for compassionate release from prison as part of plea agreement.
U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer, in an order issued Monday, called the move, which would push back by at least five months the length of time before the defendant could move for compassionate release, "inhumane," "appallingly cruel," and "senseless."
"Because this waiver provision undermines Congressional intent and is an unconscionable application of a federal prosecutor's enormous power to set the terms of a plea agreement, the Court cannot approve of the proposed Plea Agreement in this case," Breyer wrote.
Breyer's decision comes after the First Step Act of 2019, a criminal justice bill with broad bipartisan support that expanded prisoners' avenues for compassionate release from the federal system, was signed into law by President Donald Trump last year. The law amended 18 U.S.C. §3582(c)(1)(A) to allow those seeking compassionate release to petition courts directly 30 days after the warden of the defendant's facility failed to act on such a request.
But in the case of Allan Josue Funez Osorto, a man facing federal drug charges, prosecutors from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Northern District of California, excluded the 30-day language from the plea agreement.
"I agree not to move the Court to modify my sentence under 3582(c)(1)(A) until I have fully exhausted all administrative rights to appeal a failure of the Bureau of Prisons to bring such a motion on my behalf, unless the BOP has not finally resolved my appeal within 180 days of my request despite my seeking review within ten days of each decision," Funez Osorto's agreement said.
That language, Breyer wrote, would seem to require Funez Osorto to complete at least one appeal plus a year and a half of inaction by the Bureau of Prisons, rather than 30 days. The judge wrote that such a wait could be "devastating" to a person with a terminal illness or with children left uncared for. Those are circumstances which the U.S. Sentencing Commission, a policy body where Breyer has served as vice chairman and a member, has found to be "extraordinary and compelling reasons" and warranted compassionate release.
"Current circumstances put the point in excruciatingly sharp relief," wrote Breyer of the COVID-19 pandemic. "The Court has received requests for early release from multiple defendants who suffer from medical conditions that put them at high risk of death from COVID-19," wrote the judge, noting that he had granted three such requests.
Breyer, pointing out that plea agreements are often drafted by prosecutor's offices with a take-it-or-leave-it policy, said that he would not approve a plea bargain signing away the defendant's ability to come to court asking for compassionate release earlier, if necessary.
"Why would federal prosecutors exercise the tremendous discretion entrusted to them with such a lack of compassion?" the judge wrote
David Anderson, U.S. attorney for the Northern District of California, said in a phone interview Monday that the office had "at virtually the same time" as Funez Osorto's plea hearing last week adjusted language in its standard plea agreement to reflect the 30-day exhaustion requirement after being approached by local defense attorneys about the issue.
"We are working hard to protect the community one case at a time. Nothing in the record suggests this defendant Funez Osorto is particularly at any unusual health risk," Anderson said. Anderson said that in older cases, where the office had negotiated a full waiver of compassionate release, the office has allowed prisoners to bring compassionate release motions "where we thought such a waiver would be fair to the defendant."
Adam Gasner, Funez Osorto's defense attorney in San Francisco, said in an email that his client is set for sentencing in a few weeks, and he is working to exclude the waiver.
"It is a classic clash of viewpoints between the Judicial and Executive branch of our government," Gasner said. "I see Judge Breyer expressing extreme disapproval of limiting any rights of a defendant in what is now a life-and-death situation. The evidence is clear that our prisons are being infected quickly with COVID-19 and all efforts need to be made to allow prisoners to bring a motion to be released without administrative delay and red tape."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllUSPTO Director Kathi Vidal Announces Resignation Ahead of Administration Change
3 minute readFTC Receiver Eyes Fraudulent Messages Ecommerce Company's Clients
Trending Stories
- 1Elon Musk Names Microsoft, Calif. AG to Amended OpenAI Suit
- 2Trump’s Plan to Purge Democracy
- 3Baltimore City Govt., After Winning Opioid Jury Trial, Preparing to Demand an Additional $11B for Abatement Costs
- 4X Joins Legal Attack on California's New Deepfakes Law
- 5Monsanto Wins Latest Philadelphia Roundup Trial
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250