Church Sues Zoom After Bible Study Hacked With Pornography
Bottini & Bottini and Cotchett, Pitre and McCarthy filed the class action complaint after a bible study class hosted by Saint Paulus Lutheran Church on Zoom was infiltrated by a bad actor.
May 13, 2020 at 07:05 PM
5 minute read
One of the oldest churches in San Francisco is suing Zoom Video Communications Inc. after a hacker infiltrated its virtual bible study and subjected participants to pornography.
The lawsuit, brought by Bottini & Bottini and Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy on behalf of Saint Paulus Lutheran Church, is part of a growing number of legal actions against Zoom, which has gained more than 2.2 million new active users this year. The company's privacy and security practices have come under heightened scrutiny as the platform has emerged as a crucial tool for remote communication during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Saint Paulus Lutheran Church alleges that Zoom's "utter failure in providing security" made it possible for the bible group to be "Zoombombed" with pornography, including videos depicting abuse of children and babies, according to the class action complaint filed Wednesday in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California.
"In Saint Paulus's long history, it survived the Great Earthquake and Fire of 1906, the social and cultural turmoil of the 1960s–70s, and a 1995 fire that destroyed its 103-year-old cathedral building. Never did Saint Paulus imagine falling prey to Zoom's deceptive business practices and sex-offenders' depraved hacking during this unprecedented COVID19 pandemic," wrote the church's lawyers.
Zoom did not respond to a request for comment at the time of publication.
The church is suing the video conferencing platform for negligence and breach of implied contract, as well as violations of state laws including the California Consumer Privacy Act, Consumers Legal Remedies Act, and Unfair Competition Law.
The complaint asserts that on May 6, 42 minutes into an otherwise uneventful bible class, a "known serial offender" began exposing the group to footage of "adults performing sexual acts with each other and on infants and on young children." The session was password protected, according to the lawsuit, meaning it was not open to the general public.
Zoom's trust and safety department responded to the church's incident report by blocking the intruder from joining future meetings using the same Zoom software but refused to take further action, according to the church's lawyers.
"It is baffling, to say the least, how Zoom failed to protect Saint Paulus's bible-study class from a 'serial offender' who has been 'reported multiple times to the authorities,'" they wrote.
The church also reached out to Lynn Haaland, Zoom's deputy general counsel and chief compliance and ethics officer, as well as Zoom's Chief Information Security Officer Richard Farley, and Zoom CEO Eric Yuan. Haaland and Farley did not offer any additional security measures, and Yuan did not respond to the church's emails, according to the complaint.
Zoom has drawn criticism after schools and other organizations flocking to the platform have been targeted by bad actors. In March, Wexler Wallace and Tycko & Zavareei filed the first of several class action complaints against Zoom in the U.S District Court for the Northern District of California. Following a probe led by New York Attorney General Letitia James, last week Zoom agreed to tighten its security measures. The company also came under fire recently after a report from The Intercept found that the company's past claims of end-to-end encryption were unfounded.
"In our current situation, we rely on platforms like Zoom to socialize, work and, as here, pray together remotely," said Mark Molumphy of Cotchett Pitre in Burlingame. "I can't imagine a more horrific violation of privacy than that experienced by Saint Paulus and its bible study class."
Bottini & Bottini's Frank Bottini and Albert Chang said in an email that Zoom's inadequate security allowed a known offender to Zoombomb the bible-study class. "This violation of the church's sanctity was a direct result of Zoom prioritizing profit over user security. Saint Paulus looks forward to proving its case in court on behalf of all victims of Zoom's deceptive business practices and holding Zoom accountable for its misconduct," they said.
Sign up for Law.com's Legal Radar to keep up with the latest news and lawsuits in a free, personalized news feed. Track new federal litigation by industry, practice area, law firm, company and region.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllZoom Faces Intellectual Property Suit Over AI-Based Augmented Video Conferencing
3 minute read'A Warning Shot to Board Rooms': DOJ Decision to Fight $14B Tech Merger May Be Bad Omen for Industry
California Walnut Grower and German Investment Firm Vie for Lead Plaintiff Status in Super Micro Securities Action
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250