San Francisco and UC Hastings to Talk Settlement in Lawsuit Over Tenderloin Conditions
U.S. District Judge Jon Tigar on Thursday said that he would grant the parties' request to appoint U.S. Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley to oversee settlement talks in the lawsuit seeking to force the city to address homeless encampments and drug dealing in the neighborhood that's home to the University of California, Hastings College of the Law.
May 14, 2020 at 05:38 PM
4 minute read
Lawyers for the city and county of San Francisco are hoping to reach a settlement with a coalition of residents and businesses in the Tenderloin led by the University of California, Hastings College of the Law who sued the city for allowing homeless encampments and drug dealing to overwhelm the neighborhood's sidewalks.
U.S. District Judge Jon Tigar of the Northern District of California said during an initial case management conference in the case Thursday that he was going to grant the parties' request to appoint U.S. Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley to oversee settlement talks.
"She's willing to do this and she's quite enthusiastic about it," said Tigar, in a videoconference hearing Thursday afternoon. "I see that as a real piece of good news," added Tigar, who said his own schedule, which involves overseeing a case challenging prison conditions in California during the COVID-19 pandemic, has become hectic.
Tigar said that although he normally doesn't speak with judges he refers matters out to for settlement, he planned to be in contact with Corley "when the mood strikes me, because I'd sort of like to know what's going on." Tigar, however, also told Deputy City Attorney Ryan Stevens, representing the city, that the parties could ask to tell some things to Corley in confidence without worrying that she would share them with the opposing side or him.
The UC Hastings-led coalitions sued the city and county May 4 claiming that San Francisco officials had allowed the Tenderloin to become "a containment zone" for drug and homelessness issues, making the neighborhood "insufferable" and unsafe during the current public health crisis.
"This is a matter of fundamental fairness; what is a citywide problem should not be allowed to weigh disproportionately on a low-income working-class neighborhood," wrote the coalition's lawyers at Walkup, Melodia, Kelly & Schoenberger in San Francisco and Greenberg Gross in Los Angeles. "San Francisco should be prohibited from abandoning a single neighborhood, in an apparent effort to spare other neighborhoods the burdens that confront the city at-large," they wrote.
During Thursday's hearing, Walkup Melodia's Michael Kelly said that he was grateful for Tigar's "almost immediate response" of asking the city's lawyers to make an appearance and get the case moving. Kelly noted that Thursday's case management conference was pulled together on "a record timeline." Kelly asked that Tigar hold weekly meetings initially to keep tabs on the parties' progress.
Tigar, for his part, asked the city and the plaintiffs to file weekly case management statements updating him. He also told the parties to let him know if there were "public health- or urban planning-type" articles they wanted him to read presenting possible resolutions.
"I would like to be sort of an information monster about this case," Tigar said.
Tigar also said that he would like to drive around the Tenderloin to check out conditions himself. Tigar said that he wouldn't be taking pictures or entering anything into the record that would turn that case "into a dog and pony show."
"Thanks for bringing me this interesting case," Tigar said. "I hope you're able to work things out. If not, don't worry," he told the lawyers. "That's how we all make a living."
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSanta Barbara Judge Accused of Moonlighting as Attorney for Secretary/Girlfriend
4 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Decision of the Day: Judge Reduces $287M Jury Verdict Against Harley-Davidson in Wrongful Death Suit
- 2Kirkland to Covington: 2024's International Chart Toppers and Award Winners
- 3Decision of the Day: Judge Denies Summary Judgment Motions in Suit by Runner Injured in Brooklyn Bridge Park
- 4KISS, Profit Motive and Foreign Currency Contracts
- 512 Days of … Web Analytics
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250