California's Northern District Pushes Criminal Jury Trials Until July, Civil Jury Trials Until October
The court announced Thursday morning that any new criminal jury trials set before June 30 and new civil jury trials set before Sept. 30 will be postponed or vacated due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Individual judges, however, may offer bench trials by videoconference under a newly amended general order.
May 21, 2020 at 12:15 PM
3 minute read
The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California announced that any new criminal jury trials set to begin before June 30 and new civil jury trials set before Sept. 30 will be postponed or vacated due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Individual judges, however, may offer bench trials by videoconference under a newly amended general order.
"Through September 30, 2020, all civil matters will be decided on the papers, or if the assigned judge believes a hearing is necessary, the hearing will be by telephone or videoconference," wrote U.S. District Chief Judge Phyllis Hamilton in an amended general order posted to the court's website Thursday morning. "This applies to motion hearings, case management conferences, pretrial conferences, settlement conferences, Alternative Dispute Resolution ('ADR') proceedings, and bench trials," she wrote.
The order states that grand jury proceedings, which have been suspended in the district since mid-March, will resume in June "on a date and in a manner to be determined."
Thursday's announcement comes as rumors had been swirling in the local bar that the court was considering pushing off the start of any civil trials in the district until 2021.
On Monday, U.S. District Judge Richard Seeborg issued a general order in his civil cases asking parties to consider the possibility of settling given the "highly uncertain" nature of the schedule in his civil cases.
"At this juncture, no assurances can be given as to when civil trials can be resumed, and if so, whether a further suspension due to public health developments will be necessary," wrote Seeborg in a general order issued Monday in cases on his civil docket. "Accordingly, it would seem to be an optimal time for the parties to initiate or renew an exploration of possible settlement or some other form of alternative dispute resolution."
Seeborg's general order nudging parties toward discussing settlement echoed the earlier piecemeal approach the court took to addressing concerns raised by the coronavirus pandemic. During the second week of March, three judges in the district—Hamilton and Judges Vince Chhabria and Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers—revised their court procedures to limit in-person proceedings with telephonic conferences and decide more motions on the court papers. The next week, on the same day six Bay Area counties demanded residents "shelter in place" to slow the spread of COVID-19, the court issued two general orders signed by Hamilton closing all courthouses to the public and suspending new civil and criminal trials until May 1. The court also indicated it would conduct any necessary hearings via telephone or videoconference. The court last month extended the courthouse closures and emergency procedures through June 1.
Thursday's order noted that the district's courthouses and libraries will be closed for public events, tours and visits "pending further notice."
Read the order:
Read more:
Citing 'Highly Uncertain' Schedule for Civil Matters, Judge Urges Parties to Consider Settling
Northern District of California Courthouses Will Remain Closed Until June 1
San Jose Federal Courthouse Closed After Visitor Treated for COVID-19
Northern District of California Closes Courthouses, Puts Off New Trials Until at Least May
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllState Appeals Court Revives BraunHagey Lawsuit Alleging $4.2M Unlawful Wire to China
3 minute readApple Disputes 'Efforts to Manufacture' Imaging Sensor Claims Against iPhone 15 Technology
Lawsuit alleges racial and gender discrimination led to an Air Force contractor's death at California airfield
7 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250