100-Plus UC Hastings Students and Alums Sign on to Letter Criticizing the Law School's Role in Tenderloin Lawsuit
The 125-plus signatories to the letter say the high profile lawsuit against the city of San Francisco "defines the community in a way that implicitly excludes our unhoused neighbors." UC Hastings Dean David Faigman said that the school's goals in the lawsuit are "quite aligned" with those of the signatories and that he plans to respond to them in writing.
May 28, 2020 at 07:27 PM
5 minute read
A group of more than 125 students and alumni of the University of California, Hastings College of the Law have signed onto a letter to Chancellor and Dean David Faigman criticizing the school's lawsuit against the city of San Francisco seeking to address conditions on the streets in the Tenderloin neighborhood it calls home.
The letter, penned by a group of eight current students, most of whom have worked with public defenders offices as part of the school's criminal practice clinic, claims that the lawsuit brought on behalf of the school, local residents and business "defines the community in a way that implicitly excludes our unhoused neighbor."
"We believe this suit will displace the Tenderloin's houseless population and distribute it throughout San Francisco, limiting these individuals' ability to organize and support one another," the letter says. "We also believe the City will use this suit to justify increased police repression of our unhoused neighbors, many of whom are people with disabilities, African American, and Latinx people displaced from their homes by economic and political violence."
Faigman in a phone interview Thursday said that the goals of the letter writers were "quite aligned" with what the school is seeking to accomplish through the lawsuit. But he added that the letter-writers "misunderstand" the litigation and that he plans to respond to them in writing.
"As law students and lawyers well understand, a lawyer has to represent the interest of his or her client," Faigman said. The dean added that homeless residents of the Tenderloin weren't included among the plaintiffs not because of any sense of "animus," but because the homeless are "differently situated" than the plaintiff residents and business.
"I agree that the houseless have needs that need to be attended to, and I do believe that the outcome that we seek will benefit the houseless and the housed in the Tenderloin," Faigman said.
The school joined other residents and businesses in the city's Tenderloin neighborhood earlier this month claiming in a federal lawsuit that San Francisco officials have allowed the Tenderloin to become "a containment zone" for drug and homelessness issues—issues further complicated by the COVID-19 pandemic. The suit claims that the increase of people living on neighborhood streets in recent months has combined with the open-air drug sales in the neighborhood to make conditions "insufferable." Faigman said Thursday comments he's received in support of the lawsuit have outnumbered critical ones 100-to-1.
The open letter, however, claims that the school's approach would invite the city to treat the homeless as criminals. "As UC Hastings students and alumni invested in an equitable future for all Tenderloin residents, we believe our school should meaningfully challenge the social, economic, and political conditions that create and perpetuate homelessness," the letter said. "Doing so requires breaking the cycle of the failed 'war on drugs' and the gentrification that has forced so many of our houseless neighbors onto the streets."
Abel Mouton, one of the letter's authors who is in the class of 2021 at the school, said that the lawsuit should probably name San Francisco Mayor London Breed since she ignored a unanimous vote by the city's board of supervisors last month to house the city's homeless in hotels during the pandemic. "UC Hastings must realize that the relief sought from the lawsuit will have lasting effects on the Tenderloin community if [people experiencing homelessness] are displaced to the City's jails," the letter says. "By not criminalizing our unhoused neighbors, UC Hastings may begin to live up to its social justice values."
Faigman said Thursday that, ultimately, he thinks city officials, the school and the letter's signatories share a similar vision for the neighborhood where the unhoused can find shelter and access to sanitation and health care and where neighborhood streets are safe for residents and local businesses.
"Ultimately for me the bottom line is this is a political fraught problem there are rights and interest on every side including the city, the homeless and the residents and we need a strong federal judge, and I think we've got one with Judge [Jon] Tigar that is able to take into account all the rights and interests involved and come to a short and long-term solution," Faigman said.
Read the Open letter:
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSome Elite Universities Favor Wealthy Students in Admissions Decisions, Lawsuit Alleges
5 minute readHow Uncertainty in College Athletics Compensation Could Drive Lawsuits in 2025
'Basic Arithmetic': Court Rules in Favor of LA Charter School Denied Funding by California Education Department
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250