BitClave to Refund Investors $25.5M in SEC Settlement
The agency said the San Jose cryptocurrency firm led an unregistered initial coin offering of its Consumer Activity Tokens.
May 28, 2020 at 05:17 PM
2 minute read
Financial technology company BitClave PTE. has agreed to pay $25.5 million to settle charges brought by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission claiming it violated federal securities laws with its digital asset, Consumer Activity Tokens.
The settlement offers another benchmark for penalties that cryptocurrency companies might face if their offerings fall within the SEC's hazy classification for digital securities.
Despite agreeing to pay the $25.5 million disgorgement that will be distributed to investors, the San Jose-based blockchain startup did not admit to the SEC's contentions that CAT met the definition of investment contracts and BitClave should have registered the initial coin offering with the agency.
"Issuers of securities, traditional or digital, must comply with the registration requirements of the federal securities laws," Kristina Littman, chief of the SEC Enforcement Division's Cyber Unit, said in a statement. "The remedies ordered by the Commission will provide meaningful relief to investors in this unregistered offering."
Perkin Coie's Adam Schuman, who represented BitClave, declined to comment.
The settlement marks the end of the CAT digital asset, as BitClave agreed to transfer its remaining 1.32 billion CAT to a fund administrator who will permanently disable it. The company also agreed to pay more than $3.4 million in prejudgment interest and a civil monetary penalty of $400,000.
"We are pleased to resolve this regulatory matter with the SEC," according to a company statement. "We are grateful to have had support from a team and a community passionate about data privacy and finding ways to enable consumers to control when and how they share data."
According to the SEC's administrative cease and desist order, CAT had already been removed from four trading platforms while the company took its former officer, director and co-founder to California state court for allegedly misusing company funds that were raised in the ICO.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllStock Trading App Robinhood Hit With Privacy Class Action 1 Month After Alleged Data Breach
Congress and Courts Are Considering Litigation Financing: Is Disclosure Imminent?
8 minute read'A World of Credit': Ex-FTX Executive Gary Wang Sentenced to Time Served Following Cooperation
Inside Track: How 2 Big Financial Stories—an Antitrust Case and a Megamerger—Became Intertwined
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250