Citing George Floyd's Death, Prosecutors Ask State Bar to Block Police Endorsements
A spokeswoman for the California state bar said "it would be premature" for leaders of the agency to comment on a proposal for new ethics rules.
June 01, 2020 at 06:32 PM
3 minute read
Three Northern California district attorneys called on the state bar Monday to adopt new ethics rules barring elected prosecutors and district attorney candidates from accepting political contributions from law enforcement unions.
After days of protests over the death of George Floyd in police custody in Minneapolis, the DAs from San Francisco, Contra Costa and San Joaquin counties said in a video conference that professional rules should eliminate any appearance of conflict when prosecutors review allegations against police officers.
The three prosecutors—Chesa Boudin, Diana Becton and Tori Verber Salazar—were joined by former San Francisco District Attorney George Gascón, who is running for the top prosecutorial job in Los Angeles. Gascón said that while he accepted police union contributions in his 2011 campaign he will "never do so again."
"The influence or appearance of influence erodes" public trust in prosecutorial review of police misconduct, he said Monday.
A spokeswoman for the state bar said, "it would be premature" for leaders of the legal regulatory agency to comment. Messages left for representatives of the California District Attorneys Association, including its president, Alameda County District Attorney Nancy O'Malley, were not returned.
The Rules of Professional Conduct, the California Penal Code and associated case law offer guidelines for when attorneys, and specifically prosecutors, should or must recuse themselves or when they must advise their clients of a conflict.
"These rules, however, do not preclude the attorney or prosecutor from soliciting or receiving financial support from an individual or organization that is financing opposing counsel," the four DAs who appeared Monday wrote in a letter to state bar leaders. "It is illogical that the rules prohibit prosecutors from soliciting and benefiting from financial and political support from an accused officer's advocate in court, while enabling the prosecutor to benefit financially and politically from the accused's advocate in public."
Contra Costa County District Attorney Diana Becton called the nuanced language "a loophole" that "needs to change and … needs to change now."
The four prosecutors asked the bar for an expedited review of their request, although the rule-adoption process can typically be a lengthy one.
Richard Zitrin, a San Francisco lawyer and legal ethics specialist, said such a rule change would likely survive a free-speech challenge.
"There's no question that lawyers' free speech can be and is regulated by the state bar," Zitrin said. "This is in keeping with the state bar moving in the direction of significant prosecutorial enlightenment."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSanta Barbara Judge Accused of Moonlighting as Attorney for Secretary/Girlfriend
4 minute readInsurers Dodge Sherwin-Williams' Claim for $102M Lead Paint Abatement Payment, State High Court Rules
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250