Appeals Judge Jeffrey Johnson Is Ordered Removed Over Sexual Misconduct
"This action snaps an unbroken string of decisions which required either a finding of willful misconduct or a violation prior discipline before removing a judicial officer," a lawyer for Judge Jeffrey Johnson of the Second District Court of Appeal said.
June 02, 2020 at 01:06 PM
5 minute read
Updated 12:48 p.m.
Jeffrey Johnson, the Second District Court of Appeal associate justice accused of sexually harassing numerous women, including a colleague on the bench, has been ordered removed from office by the Commission on Judicial Performance.
In a 111-page order issued Tuesday, the commission said it found Johnson committed 18 counts of prejudicial misconduct and refused to take responsibility for his mistreatment of coworkers or alcohol-fueled misbehavior.
"Judges are expected to be honest, have integrity, uphold high personal standards, and treat everyone with dignity and respect, on or off the bench," according to the order, signed by former chair of the commission Nanci Nishimura. "Justice Johnson's conduct before, and during, this proceeding demonstrates that he does not meet these fundamental expectations."
All nine commissioners who participated in the case voted to oust Johnson. He is the first appellate court justice ordered removed from office in the commission's history.
Johnson's lawyer, Paul S. Meyer of Costa Mesa, said in a statement that his client will appeal the order to the California Supreme Court.
"This action snaps an unbroken string of decisions which required either a finding of willful misconduct or a violation prior discipline before removing a judicial officer," Meyer said. "Not one witness ever claimed him to be unfair in any case, or anything less than brilliant. The entire matter here involved non-judicial social conversations."
The commission's decision closes what could be the final chapter in a years-long disciplinary case against Johnson, which includes allegations of wrongdoing stretching back to his time as a federal magistrate on the Los Angeles federal court. The prosecution of the justice touched on difficult issues surrounding race—Johnson is African American—and the decisions by women to report sexual harassment against a powerful figure in the courts.
The commission found that Johnson touched four women without their consent, including Associate Justice Victoria Chaney, who said he groped her breasts and buttocks, and sexually harassed seven others. He leveraged his judicial office in an attempt to develop relationships with three more women and appeared publicly drunk in "multiple incidents," commissioners said.
Johnson denied the worst accusations and blamed his diabetes for slurred speech and an uneasy gait that mimicked drunkenness. He and his lawyers said other interactions reflected his attempt to be friendly and to socialize with subordinates.
But commissioners concluded that Johnson's misconduct was real and "severely tarnished the esteem of the judiciary in the eyes of the public."
"Given his persistent denials of serious misconduct, we do not have confidence that he can reform, as he has not conveyed that he recognizes the extent of his wrongdoing," they wrote.
Chaney and her attorney, Eric George of Browne George Ross, declined to comment on the commission's order. Dan Potter, the executive officer of the Second District Court of Appeal, did not immediately return a message asking about Johnson's status on the bench. Since July 2018, Johnson has only come to the Los Angeles courthouse for oral arguments and on weekends when he was accompanied by the clerk, Potter said in October.
The allegations against Johnson have spawned at least two lawsuits, one by his former California Highway Patrol security agent, Tatiana Sauquillo, and one by a judicial assistant. In a complaint filed this year in Los Angeles County Superior Court, Trisha Velez, an assistant to Chaney, said Johnson subjected her to five years of "unwelcome, inappropriate conduct of a sexual nature"
"Tatiana Sauquillo's courage in standing up against an appellate judge, and testifying against him, has been rewarded with what we've demanded all along: accountability," said the former CHP officer's attorney, Lisa Bloom. "The Commission on Judicial Performance's finding that Ms. Sauquillo was the victim of sexual misconduct and sexual harassment by Justice Johnson means that victims can be believed and justice is possible."
A panel of special masters concluded that Johnson made comments about Sauqillo's appearance that constituted sexual harassment, although the panel did not sustain allegations that the justice touched her inappropriately or propositioned her.
Johnson had touted himself as a candidate for the California Supreme Court and two of his colleagues, including Chaney, wrote a letter to then-Governor Jerry Brown's office endorsing him.
"The remedy chosen deprives the public of a diverse jurist who is universally acknowledged to be brilliant and exceptionally fair," Meyer said in an email Tuesday.
A former Brown administration official said Johnson was not considered for an appointment to the high court.
Read the CJP order issued today:
Read more:
'I Am Devastated': Embattled Appellate Justice Says Misconduct Charges Don't Warrant Removal
Embattled Appellate Judge Faces Sexual Misconduct Suit From Court Assistant
Appellate Judge Accused of Sexual Misconduct Pleads to Keep His Job
Special Masters' Report Assails Appellate Judge Jeffrey Johnson
Judicial Watchdog Calls Justice a 'Bully Who Preyed for Years on Women' in Closing
'I'm a Flawed Human Being,' Judge Says at Sexual Harassment Trial
This report was updated with additional information about the order, and additional comment.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCalifornia Lawmakers Reach $50M Deal to Fund Legal Fights Against Trump
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Snapshot Judgement: The Case Against Illustrated Indictments
- 2Texas Supreme Court Grapples Over Fifth Circuit Question on State Usury Law
- 3Exploring the Opportunities and Risks for Generative AI and Corporate Databases: An Introduction
- 4Farella Elevates First Female Firmwide Managing Partners
- 5Family Court 2024 Roundup: Part I
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250