Judge Pushes Back Accused LinkedIn Hacker's Trial One Last Time Over COVID-19 Concerns
U.S. District Judge William Alsup delayed until July 6 a trial that was set to resume next week in the case of a Russian man accused of hacking three Silicon Valley technology companies, citing juror concern about COVID-19 and the current civil unrest.
June 02, 2020 at 06:22 PM
5 minute read
A federal judge in San Francisco has once again delayed the resumption of the criminal trial of a Russian man accused of hacking Silicon Valley technology companies.
The trial of Yevgeniy Aleksandrovich Nikulin, who is charged with hacking LinkedIn, Dropbox and Formspring, has been put on hold since the Bay Area was put under local shelter-in-place orders in mid-March to address the COVID-19 pandemic.
U.S. District Judge William Alsup of the Northern District of California during a telephonic hearing Tuesday said that resuming the trial July 6 rather than June 8 would provide a better chance of reseating the current jury amid concerns about the virus. Alsup put the chances of keeping a jury together out of the original 12 jurors and four alternates who began hearing testimony in March at 20% if the trial were to resume next week and 70% if it were to resume next month.
"It's a gamble either way, but it's a more reasonable gamble if we wait," said Alsup.
The judge added that current civil unrest in the city and threats to the district's courthouses also convinced him that the later date was better. David Patrick Underwood, a security guard, was shot and killed while protecting the federal building that's home to the Oakland courthouse the Night of May 29.
"We're walking on eggshells," said Alsup, after mentioning the Underwood's death.
Assistant U.S. Attorney Michelle Kane had initially raised concerns about the July 6 trial date, because the FBI case agent on the matter is set to be reassigned to a field office in Indiana in the interim. She also said that the agent was anticipating a "significant family event."
"I gotta tell you, in ordinary times I would give that some weight," said Alsup, suggesting that a family vacation or a reassignment wouldn't be enough to change his mind on the July trial date.
"He's going to have to be here or you dismiss the case," Alsup said.
After Kane clarified that the agent was expecting the birth of his child July 1, Alsup said "that's good, but he can be in the court."
"He can be in Indiana on July 1 and fly out and be here on July 6," Alsup said.
Alsup mentioned that his colleague U.S. District Judge Vince Chhabria of the Northern District of California is acting as an "air traffic controller" for the collective trial schedule for the San Francisco courthouse, where current plans are for only one jury trial to move forward at a time to address public health concerns. After Kane and one of Nikulin's lawyers, Adam Gasner, said that they would possibly be willing to move forward with just 11 jurors, Alsup urged them to stipulate to doing so, if necessary. The judge put the prospect of moving forward with trial under those circumstances at closer to 90%.
"Your client needs to understand that if we don't finish with this jury, he may be languishing in pretrial detention for much longer," Alsup told Gasner, whose client has been in custody for about 44 months currently. Alsup said that if Nikulin's trial was unable to proceed with the current jury, he would not be in the front of the line for another trial date.
"I think we have a serious problem here," Alsup said. "I don't like for someone to be in pretrial detention this long."
Alsup also had stern words for Franco Muzzio of Keker, Van Nest & Peters who represents a LinkedIn witness who had earlier raised concerns about the virus in asking to provide testimony remotely, but who was prepared to come in to testify next week if he only had to appear one day and safety precautions were in place. Muzzio, citing the unpredictability of the virus, wouldn't say whether his client would be willing to come into court to testify in July or not. Alsup said that if the witness were to be allowed to testify by videotaped deposition it would put the judge in the position of forcing the jurors to come in for proceedings while the witness is allowed to stay home.
"That's not a good way to run the railroad, and I'd much rather he come in in person," Alsup said.
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Serious Disruptions'?: Federal Courts Brace for Government Shutdown Threat
3 minute read‘It's Your Funeral’: On Avoiding Damaging Your Client’s Case With Uncivil Behavior
Practice Tips From—and About—the New Judges on the Northern District of California Bench
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Sterlington Brings On Former Office Leader From Ashurst
- 2DOJ Takes on Largest NFT Scheme That Points to Larger Trend
- 3Arnold & Porter Matches Market Year-End Bonus, Requires Billable Threshold for Special Bonuses
- 4Advising 'Capital-Intensive Spaces' Fuels Corporate Practice Growth For Haynes and Boone
- 5Big Law’s Year—as Told in Commentaries
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250