Google's offices in Hamburg, Germany. Photo: Shutterstock.comGerman Publishers Drop Suit Against Google Over News Article Snippets
A consortium of about 200 German publishers dropped the suit after a Berlin district court made it clear that a 2013 German law was not applicable.
June 10, 2020 at 05:30 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com International
A consortium of German publishers has dropped its claim against Google in Berlin Regional Court asserting that the tech giant was infringing copyrights by displaying news snippets in its search engine results.
VC Media, a consortium of roughly 200 German publishers, dropped the suit after a Berlin district court made it clear that a 2013 German law was not applicable. The move ends a dispute that had lasted more than six years.
The issue of media platforms like Google violating copyright laws by using news snippets is ongoing. But the EU's Court of Justice ruled last year that a provision in current German copyright law requiring Google to pay for the use of snippets was invalid because the European Commission had not been notified of the regulation.
The European court had requested its member states to issue new copyright laws. The German government has not yet issued such a law.
Hengeler Mueller represented Google in both the dispute before the Berlin District Court and the ECJ. Raue, a German law firm based in Berlin, represented VG Media.
Publishers have repeatedly challenged the use of their content by internet platforms such as Google and Facebook, arguing that this has seriously damaged newspapers, magazines and other media, and is done in violation of copyright laws. They say the internet platforms should pay publishers for the use of their products.
In April, France's competition regulator handed Google a harsh defeat in a copyright dispute with news publishers over the use of their content online without compensation, ordering Google to start negotiating in good faith immediately to find an accord with the publishers. France recently issued a new copyright law.
The decision by VG media to drop its claim only affects its demands for past license fees, not for any putative future payments, VG Media said in a statement.
"VG Media asserts rights. If Google accepts the claim, we will enter into a license agreement on reasonable terms. If Google denies our claims and does not negotiate, we will sue," a VG Media spokesman said.
Hengeler Mueller partners Albrecht Conrad and Wolfgang Spoerr led the team representing Google. Raue partners Jan Hegemann and Robert Heine headed the team that represented VG Media.
|
Read More:
Google Wins Legal Battle With German Publishers Over News Snippet Fees
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
So You Want to Be a Tech Lawyer? Consider Product Counseling
New Class Action Points to Fears Over Privacy, Abortions and Fertility
Stock Trading App Robinhood Hit With Privacy Class Action 1 Month After Alleged Data Breach
'Water Cooler Discussions': US Judge Questions DOJ Request in Google Search Case
3 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
