California Justices Uphold Ouster of Contra Costa County Judge
"We are extremely disappointed with the court's decision to not accept Judge Laettner's petition for review," an attorney for John T. Laettner said.
June 11, 2020 at 06:34 PM
2 minute read
The California Supreme Court has denied a Contra Costa County judge's petition challenging his removal from office.
A docket entry posted Wednesday notes, without explanation, that the court rejected Judge John Laettner's petition for review of his ouster by the Commission on Judicial Performance in November. The justices' decision ends Laettner's 13 years on the bench.
The commission found that Laettner had engaged in more than two dozen instances of misconduct ranging from making inappropriate comments about women's appearances and demeanors to revoking a defendant's own recognizance release without giving him or his attorney a chance to be heard.
"We are extremely disappointed with the court's decision to not accept Judge Laettner's petition for review," said Laettner's attorney, Joseph Leveroni, an associate at Murphy Pearson Bradley & Feeney. "We remain convinced his due process rights were violated not only at the hearing before the Special Masters but before and after the hearing by actions of the Commission on Judicial Performance."
Laettner's petition alleged he was improperly blocked from arguing that allegations made against him were motivated by public defenders' unhappiness with rulings against their clients.
Laettner is the second judge removed from the Contra Costa bench in less than two years. In August 2018, the commission censured retired Judge Bruce Clayton Mills and ordered that he never hold judicial office in California again. Mills had been reprimanded by commissioners five times over a 17-year period.
Read more:
Contra Costa Judge Ordered Removed From Office for 'Significant' Misconduct
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSenator Plans to Reintroduce Bill to Split 9th Circuit
California's Chief Justice Starts Third Year With Questions About Fires, Trump and AI
4 minute readFight Over Amicus-Funding Disclosure Surfaces in Google Play Appeal
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1The Law Firm Disrupted: For Office Policies, Big Law Has Its Ear to the Market, Not to Trump
- 2FTC Finalizes Child Online Privacy Rule Updates, But Ferguson Eyes Further Changes
- 3Chief Judge Joins Panel Exploring Causes for Public's Eroding Faith in NY Legal System
- 4Pogo Stick Maker Wants Financing Company to Pay $20M After Bailing Out Client
- 5Goldman Sachs Secures Dismissal of Celebrity Manager's Lawsuit Over Failed Deal
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250