Rogue Employee, Not Hacker, Posted Pro-Trump Tweet, California Court Says
"The post did not reflect these core values and the Court recognizes the use of its resources to support partisan political causes is entirely inappropriate," Stanislaus County Superior Court said in a statement Friday. "The Court apologizes to the community and realizes it has the responsibility to do better."
June 12, 2020 at 05:14 PM
3 minute read
Stanislaus County Superior Court said Friday that an employee, not a hacker, as the court originally announced, tweeted from the court's official account promoting the reelection of President Donald Trump and chastising protesters removing confederate statues in Virginia.
The court announced Thursday that it will launch a full investigation into the incident and will take "appropriate action consistent with its personnel rules and applicable law."
The tweet, published Thursday afternoon, reposted a video uploaded from One American News Network anchor Alex Salvi featuring protesters tearing down statues within a Confederate monument in Portsmouth, Virginia, reporting that at least one person had been critically injured from a falling statue.
"Some like their karma instantly. I'll take mine in November. #Trump2020," the employee wrote, retweeting the video.
In a news release, the court said its mission was to provide equal access to justice and to serve the community with "integrity, quality and fairness."
"The post did not reflect these core values and the Court recognizes the use of its resources to support partisan political causes is entirely inappropriate," the court wrote in the statement. "The Court apologizes to the community and realizes it has the responsibility to do better."
On Wednesday, about an hour after the employee's now-deleted tweet, the court posted an apology for "any tweets that may have gone out today," claiming that the account's password had been compromised.
The court also pared down the number of accounts it is following from 30 to 20. One of those dropped was the account of former New York State judge and Fox News host Jeanine Pirro.
On Thursday, the court removed a Twitter "like" from a clip of Pirro's show about David Dorn, a retired St. Louis police captain and black man killed while trying to protect a pawn shop from looters.
The court said Friday that as a result of the incident it is imposing additional restrictions on access to its social media accounts. The social media slipup came the same day every member of the California Supreme Court issued a statement condemning racism "in all its forms," following the public and law enforcement response to the death of George Floyd, a black man who died after Minneapolis police officer Derek Chauvin kneeled on his neck for nearly nine minutes.
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Serious Disruptions'?: Federal Courts Brace for Government Shutdown Threat
3 minute read‘It's Your Funeral’: On Avoiding Damaging Your Client’s Case With Uncivil Behavior
Practice Tips From—and About—the New Judges on the Northern District of California Bench
Trending Stories
- 1Decision of the Day: Administrative Court Finds Prevailing Wage Law Applies to Workers Who Cleaned NYC Subways During Pandemic
- 2Trailblazing Broward Judge Retires; Legacy Includes Bush v. Gore
- 3Federal Judge Named in Lawsuit Over Underage Drinking Party at His California Home
- 4'Almost an Arms Race': California Law Firms Scooped Up Lateral Talent by the Handful in 2024
- 5Pittsburgh Judge Rules Loan Company's Online Arbitration Agreement Unenforceable
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250