The Next Phase of Growth: Why Strategic GC Hiring Is Continuing Amid the COVID-19 Pandemic
GC hiring has continued for many tech startups even amid the current uncertain environment. Companies need in-house legal counsel to navigate new challenges posed by the pandemic, including regulatory and compliance, labor, and privacy issues.
June 17, 2020 at 06:22 PM
5 minute read
The exponential growth of the Silicon Beach tech scene has not only changed the landscape of the Los Angeles area's business community, but has also created a significant opportunity for in-house legal talent as these companies engage with firms to aid and guide their growth. Though the COVID-19 pandemic has admittedly upended the hiring landscape for many companies, strategic GC hiring has continued for many tech startups even amid the current uncertain environment. Indeed, these hires may prove more critical than ever as companies navigate new challenges posed by the pandemic, including regulatory and compliance, labor, and privacy issues.
Often, the most significant factor that can swing the balance in favor of onboarding a tech startup's first GC is, simply, efficiency of legal spend. When companies reach the conclusion that it makes more financial and logistical sense to bring on an internal legal hire, rather than continue to engage with an outside firm. The point at which companies reach this conclusion depends on the industry and life cycle—but when this determination is reached, it's likely to assume that a GC search will soon be underway.
Indeed, as spending is scrutinized more closely during the pandemic, bringing on a GC will save attorneys' fees due to the sheer volume of previously outsourced work that this hire will now take on. Many companies have more legal work than ever before as they manage their response to the pandemic, from navigating furloughs and layoffs and closing manufacturing sites to charting the course to eventual reopening. In general, it's more efficient from both a cost and time perspective to have an internal resource on hand for these issues and questions, rather than turning to outside counsel. In addition to the immediate cost benefit this hire will offer a tech company, this individual will also be able to guide further expenditures and serve in an advisory capacity across the business more broadly.
Industry also plays a major role in this calculus. Generally, companies that operate in heavily-regulated industries, such as health care and privacy, tend to need a GC earlier on in their lifecycle in order to help them navigate the associated complexities that these regulations entail. This reality has only been heightened during the pandemic. It's true that companies in some fields—like pre-IPO companies that have now tabled these plans due to the market downturn—may put a planned GC hire on pause. However, many consumer-facing tech companies are facing increased privacy issues and need extra support at this time. Others, like healthcare-adjacent companies, are continuing to sell their products through the pandemic, or may anticipate a significant rebound by the end of the year. For those reasons, they are continuing to make strategic GC hires not only to help them chart through the current challenges, but also to position themselves competitively for an expected uptick as normal business operations eventually resume.
Though the COVID-19 pandemic has certainly slowed some hiring activity, it has also highlighted the importance of the GC as a counselor across many aspects of the business, particularly for emerging industries in tech as they deal with new challenges created by the current environment. Still, it's not always simple to find a candidate who is the right fit and provides optimal value add to a startup in a critical phase. In general, these searches can be made all the more difficult considering the candidate profile for a GC tends to be somewhat distinctive:
Companies are often looking for a GC who understands their product and where the industry is headed. GCs for tech companies also tend to have an entrepreneurial spirit and a greater tolerance for risk. Finding a candidate of this profile could take somewhat longer than filling a GC position in more traditional industries. That being said, the current uncertainty might play to the advantage of tech companies in search of the perfect GC, as some candidates might be more willing now to roll the dice on an early-stage company whose mission and future they believe in.
As companies decide whether to move ahead with GC searches, efficiency of legal spend will remain a paramount consideration. So too will their ability to bring on a strategic hire that has the right background and expertise to steer a company through the unique issues it may be facing at this time. As LA tech startups continue to operate and even grow in these times, GC hires will serve as important strategic counselors through not only the legal challenges that have emerged during the pandemic, but also in navigating businesses more broadly through an unprecedented time in history.
Gigi Birchfield is a partner in in-house counsel recruiting and managing partner of the Los Angeles office of Major, Lindsey & Africa.
PJ Harari is a partner in in-house counsel recruiting of Major, Lindsey & Africa.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllKraken’s Chief Legal Officer Exits, Eyes Role in Trump Administration
3 minute readCollectible Maker Funko Wins Motion to Dismiss Securities Class Action
How Tony West Used Transparency to Reform Uber's Toxic Culture
Trending Stories
- 1Law Firms Expand Scope of Immigration Expertise, Amid Blitz of Trump Orders
- 2Latest Boutique Combination in Florida Continues Am Law 200 Merger Activity
- 3Sarno da Costa D’Aniello Maceri LLC Announces Addition of New Office in Eatontown, NJ, and Named Partner
- 4Friday Newspaper
- 5Public Notices/Calendars
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250