Lit Funder Legalist Hits 100-Case Mark as Posner Departs
Founder Eva Shang also revealed that former federal appeals court judge Richard Posner has exited his role as an adviser because of health concerns.
June 23, 2020 at 11:38 AM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The American Lawyer
Eva Shang of Legalist, Inc.
San Francisco-based litigation funder Legalist has cracked the milestone of over 100 cases under investment, three years since the business was founded by two Harvard dropouts.
The company's investment team now includes former litigators from Fox Rothschild, Duane Morris, Gibson Dunn, Brown Rudnick and other firms. One departure, however, is famed former U.S. federal appeals court judge Richard Posner, who was announced as an adviser roughly a year ago.
Founder and CEO Eva Shang said that the retired jurist had to step away as a result of health concerns, but Legalist was in the process of bringing another former judge on board.
According to the company, it currently has capital committed to more than 100 cases via 81 investments, some of which are in portfolios. Shang said that Legalist's focus on cases that require less than $1 million in funding has opened the doors to a significant number of opportunities.
"We find there aren't a lot of funders involved in cases that usually involve small businesses," Shang said.
That means the average investment size hovers around $500,000, far less than for industry giants such as Burford Capital, which committed nearly $1.6 billion in capital to cases under its umbrella in 2019 and closed investments in 99 new legal finance assets.
Shang said that Legalist has continued to rely on algorithms that scrape federal and state court dockets for opportunities, but both the technology and the underwriting criteria are constantly being adjusted. Particularly during the COVID-19 crisis, there's been greater wariness about ensuring that anticipated judgments will be collectible.
The funder has seen particular success in cases involving partnership disputes and earnout disputes, where defendants are large companies that have tried to deny individuals their rightful share.
"Other funders don't have the patience or time for due diligence on these cases," Shang said. "Our focus means we're able to help more people."
Legalist is monitoring the surge of litigation launched in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, but the company has yet to dip its toes into the pool. Shang said that's because the business shies away from cutting-edge legal arguments, noting that courts have yet to start issuing judgments on issues such as the applicability of force majeure clauses to pandemic-related disruptions.
"We like to say our cases are more standardized," she said. "We're not interested in exploring new case law."
Read More
What's Next for Legalist, the Litigation Funding Wunderkinds With $100M to Burn
LexShares Opens New $100M Litigation Fund to Investors
After Declines, Burford CEO Points to Busy 2020, Cites COVID-19 Claims Ahead
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
LA-Area Law Firms Offer Support as Region Reckons With Raging Wildfires
Once the LA Fires Are Extinguished, Expect the Litigation to Unfold for Years
5 minute read
'Not the President's Personal Lawyer': Lawyers Share Concerns Over How AG Pick Bondi’s Loyalism to Trump May Impact DOJ
6 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Snapshot Judgement: The Case Against Illustrated Indictments
- 2Texas Supreme Court Grapples Over Fifth Circuit Question on State Usury Law
- 3Exploring the Opportunities and Risks for Generative AI and Corporate Databases: An Introduction
- 4Farella Elevates First Female Firmwide Managing Partners
- 5Family Court 2024 Roundup: Part I
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
