Lawsuit Against San Francisco Alleges 'Brutal Attack' by SFPD on Black Man Near Fisherman's Wharf
"Plaintiff's boyfriend was repeatedly struck with hands, feet and batons," wrote Tofer & Associates attorney James Doyle and Jamir Davis of the J. Davis Law Firm. "He was thrown to the ground and was forced to use his hands to protect his head and neck areas, as the baton blows would have likely resulted in death."
June 29, 2020 at 06:14 PM
3 minute read
A California woman is suing the city and county of San Francisco after police allegedly beat her boyfriend, a Black man, near Fisherman's Wharf last year.
The lawsuit follows weeks of global protests against police brutality after the killing of George Floyd in Minneapolis.
Tofer & Associates in Beverly Hills and J. Davis Law Firm in Covington, Kentucky, is representing Breonna Richard in a complaint filed June 26 in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California.
Richard claims that San Francisco police officers broke her boyfriend's leg and wrist during an evening out at Pier 39 in October. When Richard began to cry after her wallet had been stolen, her boyfriend consoled her by hugging and kissing her, according to the complaint. Richard asserts that police arrived on the scene and had shouted commands, and then pulled Richard's boyfriend from her and began "brutally attacking" him.
"Plaintiff's boyfriend was repeatedly struck with hands, feet and batons," wrote Tofer & Associates attorney James Doyle and Jamir Davis of the J. Davis Law Firm. "He was thrown to the ground and was forced to use his hands to protect his head and neck areas, as the baton blows would have likely resulted in death."
A representative for SFPD referred comment on the pending litigation to the City Attorney's Office. John Coté, communications director for the Office of City Attorney Dennis Herrera, said in an email, "We'll review the lawsuit once we've been served with it, and we will address it in court."
Richard asserts that she begged police to stop attacking her boyfriend but was ignored. When she stepped in front of police to stop the beating, the officers threw her to the ground injuring her back and wrist, according to the complaint.
After arriving at the hospital, the complaint states that district attorney investigators told Richard that they were Internal Affairs detectives, took her statements and attempted to record a private conversation between Richard and her boyfriend by leaving a recording device in the hospital room.
"The harassment and intimidation by COUNTY employees continued," Richard's attorneys write. When Richard's boyfriend was released from surgery, she alleges that police entered the hospital room unannounced and demanded that she leave, serving an emergency protective order that included a fabricated story about domestic violence between the couple. In response to the conduct of the county employees, hospital staff tightened security around her boyfriend's room, according to the complaint.
Richard and her boyfriend were ordered to separate for 12 days without contact. The police told media outlets that Richard's boyfriend strangled her and beat her, according to the suit.
About a week after the incident, Richard asserts that she found out she was pregnant but miscarried the child two weeks later.
"COUNTY employees have further conspired to conceal the truth of this outrageous attack on PLAINTIFF and her boyfriend by refusing to release video evidence, releasing the names of the officers involved and have instructed third party entities with knowledge of the incident to not release critical evidence," wrote Doyle and Davis, who did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Richard is suing for 12 causes of action including violation of her Fourth Amendment rights, battery, assault, intentional infliction of emotional distress, intentional misrepresentation, false imprisonment and negligence.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSanta Barbara Judge Accused of Moonlighting as Attorney for Secretary/Girlfriend
4 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250