Virtual Hearing Will Give Law Grads Voice About Plans for Fall Bar Exam
"The information we learn from you will be provided to members of the court for their consideration in making a final decision," the message said. "No decision will be made at the meeting itself."
July 01, 2020 at 11:13 AM
3 minute read
As states around the country reconsider plans to hold a fall bar exam, California's Supreme Court and state bar will host an online meeting July 7 to hear from law school graduates registered to take the test.
In a message sent Tuesday to applicants for the next bar exam, the state bar said the three-hour Zoom meeting will offer participants one minute each to share their thoughts with the court and bar officials. Applicants can also submit written comments.
"The information we learn from you will be provided to members of the court for their consideration in making a final decision," the message said. "No decision will be made at the meeting itself."
A spokesman for the court confirmed the planned meeting but did not know which justices, if any, would attend.
The court's justices and state bar leaders are under increasing pressure to set a firm date for the exam or to create an alternative licensing plan for thousands of recent graduates.
Citing the challenges posed by the COVID-19 pandemic, the court in April delayed the July bar exam until September and told the state bar to "make every effort possible" to administer the test online. Two months later, the justices raised the prospect of pushing back the exam to October, noting that the National Conference of Bar Examiners will offer an online version of the multiple-choice Multistate Bar Exam on Oct. 6.
Graduates have criticized the delays and questioned the feasibility, and fairness, of holding a two-day test online. Some alumni and deans are lobbying for diploma privilege, which would allow graduates to practice without passing the bar.
Oregon, Utah and Washington have announced that certain law school graduates can skip the exam this year and join the bar. Minnesota is considering a similar move and the deans of Texas law schools asked that state's high court for a one-time diploma privilege for their graduates.
California law school deans are scheduled to meet privately with representatives of the state Supreme Court on Thursday. Nineteen deans asked for the meeting in a June 14 letter, citing their students' "considerable anguish" coping with an uncertain exam date and career prospects.
The bar's message on Tuesday said the July 7 meeting will be "limited to those who registered for the fall bar exam." Public comments can be sent through July 6 to [email protected].
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSome Elite Universities Favor Wealthy Students in Admissions Decisions, Lawsuit Alleges
5 minute readHow Uncertainty in College Athletics Compensation Could Drive Lawsuits in 2025
'Basic Arithmetic': Court Rules in Favor of LA Charter School Denied Funding by California Education Department
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250