Law School Deans Lobby California Court for Diploma Privilege in Virus Era
The deans said the justices gave no indication of which exam option they may favor. State Bar officials, however, appeared early in the meeting to be leaning in favor of an online exam in October, they said.
July 02, 2020 at 06:47 PM
4 minute read
California's law school deans on Thursday pleaded with state Supreme Court justices and state bar leaders to skip the fall bar exam and grant diploma privilege to candidates for the 2020 test.
Deans from University of California, Berkeley, UC Hastings, UC Irvine, UCLA and other law schools gathered on a private Zoom meeting with Justices Goodwin Liu, Mariano-Florentino Cuéllar and Joshua Groban, as well as state bar executives, to discuss prospects for a fall exam. The UC deans said they argued that current proposals for an in-person September exam or an online October test appear unfeasible during the COVID-19 pandemic.
"The current unprecedented times demand unprecedented and courageous solutions," the four UC deans wrote to alumni after the nearly two-hour meeting. "COVID-19 has created a climate involving multiple crises, including physical health, mental health, and financial health. Multiplying the anxiety and despair of these crises, the nation is confronting and must find solutions to the systemic racism and deep inequalities endemic in our society. At this unparalleled moment in history, even using the traditional bar exam as a point of departure feels like an affront."
The deans said the justices gave no indication of which exam option they may favor. State Bar officials, however, appeared early in the meeting to be leaning in favor of an online exam in October, they said.
While an online test would avoid the physical distancing problems created by regional, in-person administrations of the test, an October exam has several drawbacks.
First, while the National Committee of Bar Examiners will offer a "limited" multistate bar exam Oct. 5 and 6, that test won't be scalable with California's exam, meaning the two portions of the test will not sync for purposes of generating a valid score, UC Hastings Dean David Faigman said Thursday. Faigman said bar officials assured attendees that their testing expert could develop a method for calibrating the scoring of the test sections.
Secondly, with thousands of applicants expected to take the fall exam, scores from an October sitting would probably not be released until mid-January, Those who fail the fall exam would in all likelihood not have enough time to register or prepare for the February test.
Finally, questions remain about the feasibility of administering a test online.
In their message to graduates, the law school deans said the experience of the 280 applicants who took last month's first-year bar examination, also known as the baby bar, was "indeterminate." Faigman said bar officials did not offer much information about administration of the test, although he noted that one test-taker experienced technical problems and was placed on hold during a help-center call.
The three justices who attended Thursday's meeting said they would keep an open mind on testing options. Liu did note he could not agree to adopting an alternative licensing plan that didn't apply equally to all law school graduates, Faigman and UC Berkeley Law School Dean Erwin Chemerinsky said.
Deans of American Bar Association-approved schools, whose students typically pass the bar at much higher rates than their colleagues from state-accredited institutions, want diploma privilege to apply only to their graduates.
The Supreme Court would have to approve the parameters of an emergency diploma privilege, including who would be eligible to receive it and whether they would have to practice under the supervision of an active lawyer or be subject to additional continuing education requirements.
States around the country continue to grapple with how, or whether, to administer a fall bar exam as COVID-19 infection numbers spike. The Texas Board of Law Examiners recommended Thursday that the state's Supreme Court cancel July and September in-person bar exams and set an online test for October. Tennessee and Florida both canceled their July bar exams over the last two days.
The California Supreme Court has scheduled an online public comment period July 7 to hear from students planning to take the bar exam this fall.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSome Elite Universities Favor Wealthy Students in Admissions Decisions, Lawsuit Alleges
5 minute readHow Uncertainty in College Athletics Compensation Could Drive Lawsuits in 2025
'Basic Arithmetic': Court Rules in Favor of LA Charter School Denied Funding by California Education Department
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250