Hacker. Photo: Lifestyle discover/Shutterstock.com.Hacker Streams Porn Into Florida Court Hearing by Infiltrating Zoom
An intruder marred the court proceedings.
July 10, 2020 at 02:35 PM
2 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Daily Business Review
It began like any other court hearing over Zoom, but this lawsuit challenging Leon County's COVID-19 mask order took an X-rated turn Friday morning. While Florida attorneys prepared to present their legal arguments, hackers infiltrated with bursts of music and a strange sort of rap involving offensive sexual language, then began streaming porn.
Politico reporter Arek Sarkissian broke the story, tweeting out a clip of the incident, which appears to show unimpressed attendees looking away and waiting for the awkward moment to pass.
The ordeal lasted about two minutes, and ended when the judicial assistant canceled the meeting and started a new one.
State Rep. Anthony Sabatini filed the underlying lawsuit June 25 on behalf of Leon County Republican Party chair Evan Power in an attempt to stop the government from mandating face coverings, arguing it's unconstitutional.
Leon Circuit Judge John C. Cooper is presiding over the lawsuit, according to online case files. He was yet to appear at the hearing when the hackers descended. Cooper ultimately denied Power's request for an emergency injunction against the masks.
M. Drew Parker, Karen Lee Asher-Cohen and Laura M. Dennis of the Radey Law Firm represent Leon county, and Anthony Frank Sabatini of the Sabatini Law Firm in Clermont represents plaintiff Power. They did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Meanwhile in the Twitterverse, Florida Rep. Anna V. Eskamani weighed in on the fiasco, commenting, "What a mess."
Another dismayed tweeter threw in their two cents, writing, "That is what happens when you do not have a good Zoom meeting administrator. There are ways to prevent this, like not allowing screen sharing or video sharing from anyone, unless given permission. Signed, me, manager of many zoom meetings."
Leon Circuit Court did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
Court rejects request to sideline San Jose State volleyball player on grounds she’s transgender
4 minute read
Stock Trading App Robinhood Hit With Privacy Class Action 1 Month After Alleged Data Breach
Justices Seek Solicitor General's Views on Music Industry's Copyright Case Against ISP
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Tips For Creating Holiday Plans That Everyone Can Be Grateful For
- 2Red Tape, Talent Wars & Pricey Office Space Greet Firms Entering Saudi Arabia
- 3A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to Becoming Clerk of the Forum
- 4Pa. Supreme Court Taps New Philadelphia Family Division Administrative Judge
- 55th Circuit Rules Open-Source Code Is Not Property in Tornado Cash Appeal
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
