Microsoft, Google and Amazon Face Privacy Suits Over Biometrics
The lawsuits target the companies' use of IBM's Diversity in Faces Dataset, developed to reduce racial and gender inaccuracies and biases in facial recognition technology.
July 15, 2020 at 07:08 PM
4 minute read
Flickr users are alleging that Microsoft, Google and Amazon violated privacy laws when the companies used their images in a data set aimed to lessen the racial and gender biases in their facial recognition technologies.
In a trio of class action complaints, two Illinois residents allege that Microsoft, Google and Amazon violated the state's Biometric Information Privacy Act by using IBM's Diversity in Faces Dataset, made up of about 1 million Flickr images.
Loevy & Loevy and Carlson Lynch filed the lawsuits Tuesday in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California and the Western District of Washington.
The lawsuits were surfaced on Law.com's Legal Radar.
"In recent years, an 'arms race' has developed amongst for-profit companies seeking to become market leaders in the facial recognition arena," the attorneys wrote. "Critical to winning this battle has been to[sic] the ability to claim a low identification error rate—i.e., the for-profit companies want to herald the accuracy of their products, including accuracy in identifying woman[sic] and people of color." That's where IBM's Diversity in Faces Dataset comes in. IBM created the dataset to help minimize inaccuracies and biases in facial recognition technology and began offering the dataset to companies such as Microsoft, Google and Amazon.
The lawsuits allege that the companies improved their facial recognition products with biometric identifiers gleaned from images of Flickr users Steven Vance and Tim Janecyk, "thereby making those products and technologies more valuable in the commercial marketplace." Vance and Janecyk contend that the companies did not offer the proper disclosures and consents required by Illinois law. In addition to statutory damages of up to $5,000 per BIPA violation, the plaintiffs are asking the court for an injunction prohibiting the companies from continuing to use and profit from class members biometrics.
The lawyers underlined the tech companies' ties to Illinois, noting that Microsoft, for instance, "conducted extensive business within Illinois related to the facial recognition products it unlawfully developed using Plaintiffs' and Class Members' biometric identifiers and information." Underlining the companies' connection to Illinois could possibly be an attempt to circumnavigate issues related to standing and venue when litigating out-of-state BIPA complaints—issues that were raised in Facebook's facial recognition lawsuit in the Northern District of California.
A Microsoft spokesperson said the company is aware of the suit and reviewing it. "We take privacy seriously and we are committed to ensuring our AI technology is developed and used responsibly," the spokesperson said. Google and Amazon did not respond immediately to a request for comment Wednesday afternoon.
Sign up for Law.com's Legal Radar to keep up with the latest news and lawsuits in a free, personalized news feed. Track class actions and who's getting the work by industry, practice area, law firm, company and region.
|This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSo You Want to Be a Tech Lawyer? Consider Product Counseling
New Class Action Points to Fears Over Privacy, Abortions and Fertility
Stock Trading App Robinhood Hit With Privacy Class Action 1 Month After Alleged Data Breach
'Water Cooler Discussions': US Judge Questions DOJ Request in Google Search Case
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 2Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 3NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 4A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
- 5Deception or Coercion? California Supreme Court Grants Review in Jailhouse Confession Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250