Lawyers for Thernaos' Elizabeth Holmes Ask to Push Back Trial Until April Amid COVID-19 Concerns
"I'm sitting in the ceremonial courtroom alone, and I look out and try to envision what a jury trial for three months would look like here, maybe 12 jurors and 5 alternates, maybe more," said U.S. District Judge Edward Davila, as parties in the federal case against Elizabeth Holmes work to pinpoint a trial date that's safe in light of the coronavirus pandemic.
July 20, 2020 at 05:50 PM
5 minute read
Lawyers for Elizabeth Holmes are asking the court to push back the trial date in the federal fraud case against the founder of defunct blood testing company Theranos.
During a Zoom hearing Monday, Holmes' lawyers told U.S. District Judge Edward Davila of the Northern District of California that going to trial anytime soon will be difficult. Williams & Connolly's Lance Wade said proceeding in the midst of a pandemic would come at great risk given that the trial could last up to three months, and that a number of the 170 witnesses are coming from COVID-19 hot spots, such as Arizona, Texas and Florida. Wade suggested pushing back the Oct. 27 trial date to April.
"As we think through these steps and think about the way this trial will proceed over three months, what happens if I wake up with a sore throat, or one of the jurors, or a member of the court?" Wade asked.
Davila asked Wade about the prospect of trial by video, and the attorney said he wouldn't be comfortable in a case such as this for a number of reasons, including confrontation rights. Either way, he said, the whole trial could not be completed remotely. "We conferred with the government on this topic, and we did not see a workable solution in a case of this size," he said.
The government, represented by Assistant U.S. Attorney Robert Leach, indicated it is ready to proceed with the case now, but recognized the hurdles caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. Leach pointed to the "real changes and unique challenges" to this case, such as that at least 16 of the government's witnesses are above the age of 65 and would have to travel to California from high-risk areas. However, he said April 2021 is too long, and recommended a trial date of February 2021.
Davila said the pandemic is a "real shadow that looms over the work we do and the country we love," and that everyone's new responsibility is to make sure the virus doesn't spread, a responsibility that is not lost on him as he considers how to best protect the parties and his own staff.
"I'm sitting in the ceremonial courtroom alone, and I look out and try to envision what a jury trial for three months would look like here, maybe 12 jurors and 5 alternates, maybe more," he said. The judge said he is trying to envision how the juror's placement in the "cheap seats" of the courtroom as opposed to the jury box could affect the trial.
He said that an October trial date might be a bit "ambitious," but that ideally the parties would be ready for trial by then, so that they're just waiting on a safe time to hold the trial.
"I'm hopeful we can get the case tried in Q1 next year, but what that exact date is, I don't have the information to set that date today," he said.
Davila also heard arguments on a motion to dismiss superseding information, which charges Holmes with wire fraud and conspiracy to commit wire fraud, doubles the time frame of the alleged conspiracy and includes additional categories of victims.
Williams & Connolly's Amy Saharia said it is important to grant the motion even though the government filed a second superseding indictment on July 14, because leaving the superseding information on the docket could toll the statute of limitations for certain charges.
She said the government filed the information in the first place "to create a way around the statute of limitations, around certain counts that might be time-barred by the time it was able to return a second superseding indictment."
The government argued that the motion to dismiss the superseding information is moot after it filed the latest indictment. "The court should not dismiss superseding information," said Leach. "If the government filed an information and followed up with an indictment, the ordinary course would be to litigate the indictment and allow the information to sit there."
Davila indicated interest in deferring ruling on the matter until he hears arguments regarding the second superseding indictment.
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWilson Sonsini Knocks Out Claims Against Inhibrx Biosciences in Trade Secrets Verdict
'Blatant and Audacious': Sideman & Bancroft Wins Injunction for Biotech Startup Trilobio in Trade Secrets Theft Case
Los Angeles Secures $35M Settlement From Monsanto in Water Contamination Lawsuit
After Guiding Illumina Through Harrowing Merger Fight, GC Charles Dadswell to Depart
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Decision of the Day: Judge Reduces $287M Jury Verdict Against Harley-Davidson in Wrongful Death Suit
- 2Kirkland to Covington: 2024's International Chart Toppers and Award Winners
- 3Decision of the Day: Judge Denies Summary Judgment Motions in Suit by Runner Injured in Brooklyn Bridge Park
- 4KISS, Profit Motive and Foreign Currency Contracts
- 512 Days of … Web Analytics
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250