Judge William Fletcher of the U.S. Court of Appeal for the Ninth Circuit. Photo by Jason Doiy/ALM 'Lawyer-Driven' Litigation? 9th Circuit Questions Why Prop 8 Trial Video Should Stay Sealed
An attorney seeking to keep videotapes of the 2010 trial under seal called a Ninth Circuit judge's questioning of whether the litigation was lawyer-driven "astounding."
December 07, 2020 at 09:24 PM
3 minute read
A Ninth Circuit panel on Monday quizzed lawyers from a Washington, D.C., litigation boutique about their motivations for trying to keep under wraps videotapes of the 2010 trial that concluded a ban on same-sex marriage was unconstitutional.
The judges repeatedly asked John Ohlendorf of Cooper & Kirk for declarations or other evidence in the record that his clients, including former California state Sen. Dennis Hollingsworth, really care whether the hours of tapes are released. Public radio and television station KQED and same-sex marriage advocates have asked the courts to lift the seal on the recordings U.S. District Chief Judge Vaughn Walker made of the landmark case.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
Growth of California Firms Exceeded Expectations, Survey of Managing Partners Says
5 minute read
Google Makes Appeal to Overturn Jury Verdict Branding the Play Store as an Illegal Monopoly
5 minute read
Eight Years On, A&O Shearman’s Fuse Legal Tech Incubator Is Still Evolving
4 minute read
Chicago Law Requiring Women, Minority Ownership Stake in Casinos Is Unconstitutional, New Suit Claims
5 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1'A Shock to the System’: Some Government Attorneys Are Forced Out, While Others Weigh Job Options
- 2Lackawanna County Lawyer Fails to Shake Legal Mal Claims Over Sex With Client
- 3Florida Judge Denies Motion to Dismiss in $150M Plane Crash Lawsuit Involving Flow La Movie
- 4HSF Accounts Show US Operating Losses Last Year But Revenue Increased Slightly
- 5Sheppard Mullin, Morgan Lewis and Baker Botts Add Partners in Houston
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
