This is Part II of the appreciation of United States District Judge Alsup of the Northern District of California to mark the occasion of his taking senior status. Part I is available here.

Judicial innovations

Case law is not normally described as “innovative.” To the contrary, case law’s development is inherently cautious, with precedent supplying the rules and principles for later decisions. Indeed, stare decisis accepts that precedent can be wrong—but the law will apply it anyway.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]