When initiating a lawsuit against a Japanese defendant, effecting proper service of process is one of the first challenges facing a U.S. plaintiff. Without proper service, default judgments are unenforceable in Japan, and the case may be derailed before it even gets started. This article discusses available methods of serving a Japanese corporate defendant using examples from recent litigations.

Service under the Hague Convention on the Service Abroad of Judicial and Extrajudicial Documents in Civil or Commercial Matters (the Convention) is one of the most common methods for serving Japanese corporations. In addition, Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure also allow for service by: (1) following applicable state laws, including those which allow for service on a foreign corporation through a U.S. subsidiary, and (2) pursuant to a court order, by methods that are not prohibited by the Convention—for example, service to the foreign defendant corporation’s U.S. legal counsel. Below, we explain each method of service, and discuss some benefits and drawbacks associated with each option.

Service Under the Convention

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]