Surprise Plea Deals in Los Angeles Water Billing Lawsuit Scandal Signify Much More to Come
Agreements between federal prosecutors and two key figures in the public corruption probe leave plenty of room for more cooperation and more indictments.
December 09, 2021 at 07:03 PM
7 minute read
White Collar CrimeFor Los Angeles lawyer Brian Kabateck, the most surprising aspect of the first criminal case over a municipal water overbilling class action lawsuit is the finality of it.
Paul O. Paradis' agreement with the U.S. Attorney's Office in the Central District of California calls for him to plead guilty to a federal bribery charge that's based on facts Paradis has long tried to publicly refute.
It puts the New York lawyer at the forefront of a four-year bribery scheme involving a collusive lawsuit, secret deals, sham lawyering and fake adversaries, and it leaves no room for denial: Paradis initialed each of the 27 pages, attesting to their accuracy and admitting every word of the narrative.
"I was surprised that he pled, given how strident he was in his fighting of this whole thing for a long time," Kabateck told Law.com.
A new plea deal unveiled Monday against David H. Wright, the former manager of the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power, says Paradis "began actively cooperating" with the FBI in a grand jury probe "on or about March 29, 2019." Kabateck said that's "beyond surprising."
"It's not believable," Kabateck said. "You have no idea how this guy's lawyers personally attacked me."
Paradis' plea deal appeared to surprise the Los Angeles City Attorney's Office, too. An initial statement from spokesman Rob Wilcox treated it as an allegation, with City Attorney Mike Feuer saying "if that allegation is true" the conduct is inconsistent with his office's standards. Hours later, Wilcox emailed a new statement from Feuer that acknowledged Paradis had admitted the crime: "I am beyond outraged that anyone would breach their duties to the public we serve, as this plea agreement reflects."
Wilcox declined further comment when contacted by Law.com.
|'The City Did What It Promised'
As the plaintiff attorney now in charge of the class action lawsuit at the center of the scandal, Kabateck is uniquely positioned as both an observer and a player, tasked with ensuring the class he now represents has been fairly compensated while watching as a federal investigation engulfs the key people who came before him.
Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Elihu M. Berle appointed him and his firm Kabateck LLP to take over the reopened case in April 2019, nearly two years after approving the $67 million settlement. Kabateck said he's focused on "what happened, and how did it affect the ratepayers, the customers."'
The case is still open—a status conference is scheduled for next Thursday—as 35 LADWP customers appeal a special master's ruling on their refunds claims. But Kabateck and the city have tentatively agreed on fees, according to minutes from a Nov. 18 conference, and Kabateck said in an interview he's sure ratepayers received the refunds they were properly due.
"I have a high level of confidence that the city did what it promised to do once there was a settlement," Kabateck said.
"It's now been not just checked but triple checked that the intent of this settlement—the spirit of the settlement—has been fulfilled," Kabateck continued. "My investigation revealed that."
Kabateck said Paradis refused to cooperate with his investigation.
"He was not cooperative in 2019, and he was combative. His lawyers were combative with my investigation. … So yeah, I am surprised that now this has changed," Kabateck said. "As of recently, he was trying to file lawsuits against people."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'A World of Credit': Ex-FTX Executive Gary Wang Sentenced to Time Served Following Cooperation
Appellate Judges Grill Lawyer for Ex-Uber Security Chief Who Wants Conviction Tossed
Former FTX Executive Caroline Ellison Sentenced to Two Years in Prison, $11 Billion Forfeiture for Fraud
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250