'My Civil Calendar Is a Mess': Attorneys, Judges Rattled by COVID-19 Jury Trial Suspensions
The return to COVID-driven trial uncertainty in some districts has left not only attorneys in a lurch but also judges, many of whom already are facing massive caseloads and trial backlogs exacerbated by the first court closures in 2020.
January 11, 2022 at 05:24 PM
6 minute read
COVID-19Her trial team was already settled into the hotel when Monica Latin got the call Friday afternoon. The jury trial set to begin Monday in U.S. District Judge Robert L. Pitman's Austin, Texas, courtroom had been called off because of the region's rising COVID-19 infections.
"They'd already unloaded everything in the courthouse," Latin, managing partner at Carrington, Coleman, Sloman & Blumenthal, said in an interview with Law.com. "It's like putting the racehorse into the starting gate and then calling off the race."
For months, Latin's Dallas-based firm had been booked this week for jury trials in both Texas and California, with Latin set to fly to Orange County to try a breach-of-contract lawsuit the firm brought on behalf of a technology staffing company. Now the trial calendar is empty, after Latin learned Jan. 3 that the Central District of California was suspending jury trials until at least Jan. 24.
"It's impossible to second-guess any of these decisions under these circumstances," Latin said. "I think all of the courts are making the best decisions that they can, and I think everyone appreciates that."
Federal courts across the country are announcing trial suspensions similar to the Central District's, including the Northern District of California in San Francisco, the District of New Jersey and the District of Connecticut. Others such as Pitman's Western District of Texas are still operating at the judges' discretion, which can mean last-minute delays like Latin's team experienced or rebuffed postponement requests like a trial team for 3M recently experienced with Judge M. Casey Rodgers in the Northern District of Florida.
|Trial Backlog 'Until Eternity'
This return to COVID-19-driven trial uncertainty in some districts has left not only attorneys in a lurch but also judges, many of whom already are facing massive caseloads and trial backlogs exacerbated by the first court closures in 2020.
The Central District didn't hold jury trials in any of its Los Angeles, Santa Ana or Riverside courthouses for 14 months, and the number of trials that could go at a time was still limited when juries returned last June.
U.S. District Judge John A. Kronstadt in Los Angeles told civil counsel in a Zoom hearing Monday that criminal matters will take priority once trials resume.
"I think we all have to recognize we can't have the level of certainty that we'd have under other circumstances," Kronstadt said.
Kronstadt's colleague, U.S. District Judge Jesus G. Bernal, said "it's likely" the trial suspension will be extended, and he warned attorneys that the current Jan. 25 trial date is still tentative.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'My Lyft Ride Has Come to an End': GC-Turned-President Kristin Sverchek Helped Build Ride-Hailing Pioneer
Virus Insurance Policy Doesn't Cover Restaurant's COVID Closure, California Supreme Court Says
3 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Elon Musk Names Microsoft, Calif. AG to Amended OpenAI Suit
- 2Trump’s Plan to Purge Democracy
- 3Baltimore City Govt., After Winning Opioid Jury Trial, Preparing to Demand an Additional $11B for Abatement Costs
- 4X Joins Legal Attack on California's New Deepfakes Law
- 5Monsanto Wins Latest Philadelphia Roundup Trial
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250