Judge Demands More Info on Pinterest's Purported Nixing of Nondisclosure Agreements
Pinterest lawyers did not file a response by the judge's deadline, so on Tuesday he gave them until Friday to respond.
February 09, 2022 at 01:50 PM
3 minute read
Securities LitigationPinterest made a splash when it announced it would no longer be requiring nondisclosure agreements for harassment or discrimination lawsuits, part of a securities derivative settlement related to workplace claims.
Now the judge in charge of approving the settlement, U.S. District Judge William Alsup, wants more information.
Noting that the special committee recommendation "did not involve this policy change," Alsup on Feb. 2 gave the settling parties five days to provide a sworn statement establishing:
- Whether what counsel said is true, that Pinterest has committed not to require any NDAs in resolutions of harassment or discrimination complaints.
- The date that this change went into effect.
- That what counsel implied is true: that Pinterest will not change its policy back to requiring NDAs for harassment and discrimination complaint resolution.
- What specific notice of this policy has been or will be given to those subject to NDAs?
Plaintiff lawyer Julie Goldsmith Reiser of Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll in Washington, D.C., counsel for interim lead plaintiff the Employees' Retirement System of Rhode Island, filed a seven-page response on Monday, saying among other things, "Pinterest will not be enforcing existing NDAs for individuals who made gender or race discrimination claims related to the underlying facts and circumstances of incidents and the reporting process."
Reiser said Pinterest is not notifying people who are subject to existing NDAs that those NDAs will be void under the settlement, but she cited the widespread publicity the settlement is receiving, including from Pinterest whistleblower Ifeoma Ozoma, who along with Pinterest employee Aerica Shimizu Banks first brought the allegations that became the basis for this case.
"She regularly interacts on social media with current and former Pinterest employees who are curious about her experience and about Company policy related to discrimination, harassment, and NDAs," Reiser wrote. "Messages by Ms. Ozoma and others regarding this settlement and specifically the NDA release reached a very wide audience."
"Given the extensive coverage and what we know to be true about whistleblowers, it is difficult to imagine that a Pinterest employee who entered into an NDA arising from discrimination or harassment and would like to speak out, but feels restrained by their NDA, is unaware of this settlement provision," the filing continues. "Plaintiffs and their counsel are extremely proud of the settlement achieved in this case, including a robust array of over fifty reforms, including numerous novel provisions. We believe the settlement comfortably meets the standards for both preliminary and final approval of a settlement."
Pinterest lawyers at Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer in Menlo Park missed Alsup's deadline. The judge issued an order Tuesday saying he "appreciates the sworn response by plaintiff's counsel" but still requires a sworn statement from Pinterest, too. He gave the company until noon Friday to respond.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSupreme Court Hearing on Facebook's Alleged Nondisclosure Yields 'Freakish' Hypotheticals
Hueston Hennigan Secures Dismissal of SEC Action Against Ex-PwC Auditor in Mattel-Linked Case
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-58
- 2Sweet James Clinches $17.4M Personal Injury Jury Verdict in California's Kings County
- 3In Lame-Duck Session, US Senate Confirms Illinois Federal Judge on Bipartisan Vote
- 4Gordon Rees Opens 80th Office, ‘Collaboration Hub’ in Palo Alto
- 5The White Stripes Drop Copyright Claim Against Trump Campaign
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250