Cooley's Mikes—Rhodes and Attanasio—on the 'Barristerization' of the Big Firm Trial Bar and What to Do About It
"I think if you had more lawyers who understood the trial dynamic and could really meaningfully assess risk at trial and were willing to do that, you'd have more clients willing to go to trial," says Attanasio, the chair of the firm's global litigation department.
February 16, 2022 at 07:30 AM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Litigation Daily
(L-R)Michael Rhodes and Michael Attanasio of Cooley . Courtesy photos
We hope you enjoy this excerpt from Litigation Daily, the exclusive source for sharp commentary on mega court battles, winning strategies and the issues that obsess elite litigators. Law.com subscribers can sign up for The AmLaw Litigation Daily newsletter here. Anyone else can click here to subscribe.
As I've started reporting about what the dearth of civil jury trials means to Big Law firm litigation practices, two of the first lawyers I've spoken with are Michael Rhodes and Michael Attanasio, the past and present chairs of the global litigation department at Cooley respectively.
For one, both have actually tried cases in the past few months, masked jurors and all.
But what put Rhodes, in particular, top of mind on the topic was a podcast interview he gave late last year to Jay Edelson, the founder of Edelson PC and his longtime adversary in privacy class actions. Although Rhodes has a solid record against Edelson, the two were on opposite sides of the $650 million settlement that Facebook reached to settle claims one of its photo-tagging features violated the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act. Edelson represented class members and Rhodes the company. Naturally.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All![‘Listen, Listen, Listen’: Practice Tips From Judges in the Oakland Federal Courthouse ‘Listen, Listen, Listen’: Practice Tips From Judges in the Oakland Federal Courthouse](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/ec/30/b8c5deb348739c0c591e8a638bbc/westmore-ryu-rogers-gilliam-2-767x633-1.jpg)
‘Listen, Listen, Listen’: Practice Tips From Judges in the Oakland Federal Courthouse
![Judge Accuses Trump of Constitutional End Run, Blocks Citizenship Order Judge Accuses Trump of Constitutional End Run, Blocks Citizenship Order](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/4b/f1/637ea3414adda845948e88829724/john-coughenour-767x633.jpg)
Judge Accuses Trump of Constitutional End Run, Blocks Citizenship Order
3 minute read![Pistachio Giant Wonderful Files Trademark Suit Against Canadian Maker of Wonderspread Pistachio Giant Wonderful Files Trademark Suit Against Canadian Maker of Wonderspread](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/d6/3d/dda18e5248ba9a8e8f3914d4ef2e/wonderful-company-own-your-hunger-767x633.jpg)
Pistachio Giant Wonderful Files Trademark Suit Against Canadian Maker of Wonderspread
4 minute read![TikTok Opts Not to Take Section 230 Immunity Fight to U.S. Supreme Court TikTok Opts Not to Take Section 230 Immunity Fight to U.S. Supreme Court](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/thelegalintelligencer/contrib/content/uploads/sites/292/2022/04/TikTok-App-13-767x633-1.jpg)
TikTok Opts Not to Take Section 230 Immunity Fight to U.S. Supreme Court
4 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1NY No-Fault Insurance Adopts Worker’s Compensation Fee Schedule
- 2With AI Expected to Be a Focus This Year, What Changes Can Midsize Firms Expect?
- 3Dissenter Blasts 4th Circuit Majority Decision Upholding Meta's Section 230 Defense
- 4NBA Players Association Finds Its New GC in Warriors Front Office
- 5DC Circuit Keeps Docs in Judge Newman's Misconduct Proceedings Sealed
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250