Michael Avenatti Pleads Guilty to Federal Wire Fraud and Tax Crimes in California
There is no deal with prosecutors, who have not said whether they'll keep pursuing Avenatti's remaining 31 charges.
June 16, 2022 at 04:33 PM
7 minute read
Michael Avenatti pleaded guilty Thursday to five federal felonies, admitting a criminal scheme to defraud clients of their settlement money as well as to trying to obstruct an Internal Revenue Service investigation into his failed coffee shop venture.
Avenatti entered the pleas without an agreement with the U.S. Attorney's Office after failed attempts to strike a deal, leaving 31 remaining charges that prosecutors haven't decided if they'll keep pursuing.
He said plans to seek the dismissal of his remaining tax and bankruptcy charges for violation of the Speedy Trial Act, but six wire fraud counts remain, and Senior U.S. District James Selna said he's "not inclined to engage in two sentencings." The judge scheduled a "placeholder" sentencing date of Sept. 19, with the understanding that it will be vacated if prosecutors pursue the remaining charges.
Avenatti told Selna he disagrees with prosecutors' assertion that the total amount of money associated with his fraud scheme is $9 million, with another $5 million linked to his tax crime.
"That will be a fight for another day," Avenatti said. "But again, my position is that it will be drastically less than that."
Dressed in a baggy gray jail sweatshirt and tan pants, Avenatti replied, "I'm obviously nervous, your honor. But health wise. I'm fine," when Selna asked how he was feeling. He then answered a series of questions from the judge to establish he was clearheaded, acting of his free will and understood his rights. That includes what he was giving up – his right to remain silent – and what he getting into – an unknown sentence that could be up to the consecutive, statutory maximum of 83 years in prison.
Avenatti also read a statement about his wire fraud crimes to establish the court-required factual basis for his guilty pleas, telling Selna he was licensed in California from June 2000 through 2020 and represented "thousands of clients during that time" including the four clients who are the victims in the four wire fraud counts. "I misappropriated and misused certain of their settlement funds to effectuate a plan and I effectuated wire transfers in pursuit of that plan," Avenatti said before describing each of the wire transfers, which ranged from $1,900 to $200,000.
"Did you understand that in making those transfers you were carrying out a scheme to defraud each of your clients?" Selna asked.
"Yes," Avenatti answered.
"And did you understand that you were not authorized to make those transfers by your clients?" Selna asked.
"Yes," Avenatti answered.
"Did you make those transfers voluntarily?" Selna asked.
"Yes," Avenatti answered.
Avenatti also described his tax crime, saying he'd previously served as CEO of Global Baristas LLC – it owned the Tully Coffee's chain – and obstructed the IRS's tax collection efforts by instructing employees "to undertake various efforts."
Assistant U.S. Attorney Ranee Katzenstein said she wasn't "entirely" satisfied with Avenatti's stated factual basis because he needed to admit he "acted corruptly," so Avenatti on the spot admitted he'd done so. Selna asked him a couple more questions, and Avenatti admitted he should have told the clients about the wire transfers. Katzenstein then said there "are sufficient facts" to support the pleas but "obviously we will be supplementing the record extensively prior to sentencing."
That sets the stage for what Assistant U.S. Attorney Brett Sagel said "might be a somewhat substantial sentencing hearing," with he and Katzenstein apparently planning to detail Avenatti's crimes in much greater detail.
After court, Sagel told reporters Avenatti admitted what prosecutors and the IRS "have been saying for several years now: That he committed unlawful and audacious acts to steal money from his clients to line his own pockets."
"In addition to defrauding his legal clients, he also didn't pay his taxes," Sagel said. "Today is step 1 before the government decides what to do on the remaining counts. But he will now be sentenced on his conducts of violating his duties to his clients and his duties as a taxpayer to the IRS."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllChina Resident Sentenced to 2 Years for Stealing Tesla Trade Secrets
Ben Brafman Reflects on Nearly 50 Years as a Defense Attorney
Like a Life Raft: Ben Brafman Reflects on Nearly 50 Years as a Defense Attorney
Ex-CFO of San Francisco Law Firms Pleads Guilty to $1.3M Embezzlement Scheme, DOJ Announces
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250