How Kaizen Can Improve Your Law Practice
Attorneys Elisa Reiter and Daniel Pollack share some tips for continuously improving with Kaizen, a philosophy and management approach.
September 01, 2023 at 05:55 PM
4 minute read
Originally used by the Toyota company in Japan in the 1950s, Kaizen ("good change") is a philosophy and management approach of continuous improvement that can be applied to various aspects of life, including personal and professional development. Focusing on small, ingrained changes performed on a daily basis, here are some tips for continuously improving with Kaizen for law firms.
|- Get organizational buy-in: To sustain continuous improvement, it is important to instill an understanding of Kaizen as a long-term practice, rather than a management initiative. Everyone in the organization—senior partners, associates, paralegals, accountants, secretaries, runners, law clerks and any other staff—should be involved in the process.
- Identify issues and opportunities: Continuous positive change involves identifying issues and opportunities for improvement. This can be done by observing the workplace, gathering feedback from employees, and analyzing data. Most importantly, this means accepting challenges to the status quo. For instance, think of the changes wrought by the calculator, the word processor, the telefax machine, the personal computer, paperless offices, and implementing AI in legal work.
- Implement small, positive changes: Kaizen focuses on applying minute, repetitive changes that result in major improvements over time. These changes should be based on cooperation and commitment and involve all employees. There is a high demand for legal services. Who can best meet client needs in an efficient, friendly, systematic fashion? Is learning by osmosis—when a junior lawyer had the opportunity to shadow a partner and learn at the courthouse—a thing of the past?
- Measure and evaluate results: After implementing changes, it is important to measure and evaluate the results. This helps to identify whether the changes have been effective and whether further improvements are needed.
- Create a culture of continuous improvement: Kaizen is not just a tool for improving processes. It is a way of thinking and a culture that values continuous improvement. By creating a culture of continuous improvement, organizations can sustain improvements over the long term.
Here are some simple and more complex ideas to consider:
|- Finding cost savings and ease of motion by going paperless.
- Scheduling lunches and other networking events with ease via calendar invites, including choice of location. Consulting with younger associates for new apps that can benefit the practice.
- Incorporating AI into your practice (ChatGPT, Perplexity AI, Bard AI, AdBeautifulAI, AdCreativeAI.
- Using Clio, TrustMyCase, CaseFox, iTimeKeep, TimeClock Plus for time management.
- Using a trial notebook taking on new dimensions by trying your case from the comfort and ease of your iPad (TrialPad).
- Using FaceAppAI to morph your visage from junior associate to senior partner with a few clicks, rather than via the school of hard knocks. Or, reverse the process as you clamor for an understanding of innovations; and
- Using the same font style for all documents, unless alternatives are mandated (such as when compiling an appellate brief or when dealing with a patent application).
Does Kaizen sound too fluffy and abstract? Here are some popular, inexpensive books that go into more depth:
|- How to Set Goals with Kaizen & Ikigai: A Japanese strategy-setting guide. Focus, Cure Procrastination, & Increase Personal Productivity
- Kaizen: Advanced Guide of Effective Kaizen Methods and Strategies in the Information Era
- The Kaizen Pocket Handbook
- Kaizen: A Comprehensive Beginner's Guide to Learn the Realms of Kaizen from A-Z
Some attorneys and law firms may find they can continuously improve with Kaizen. It is important to remember that Kaizen is a long-term commitment and requires daily effort and dedication to achieve significant improvements over time. Kaizen is about cultivating a constant mindset of honest self-reflection—not too harsh, not too self-congratulatory. Always seeking the next modest challenge.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBuild It and They Will Come: Tips to Market Your Practice as a Junior Attorney
6 minute readThe 'Biden Effect' on Senior Attorneys: Should I Stay or Should I Go?
9 minute readEx-eBay CLO Tells WIPL Attendees: You Can Toot Your Own Horn and 'Still Be a Humble Person'
Trending Stories
- 1As 'Red Hot' 2024 for Legal Industry Comes to Close, Leaders Reflect and Share Expectations for Next Year
- 2Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 3Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 4Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 5Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250