Every Attorney Should Make a Succession Plan
In addition to professional cannons, it is important to take practical steps to ensure a smooth transition in the event of incapacity or retirement, according to attorneys Elisa Reiter and Daniel Pollack.
September 25, 2023 at 05:00 AM
8 minute read
As COVID fades, we are left with many important lessons. Among them, the need to recognize the importance of having a professional succession plan (professional will) in place in the event an attorney is temporarily or permanently incapacitated. Such a succession plan may also come into play in the event the attorney chooses to retire, or simply dies. Here are some pertinent provisions from the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct:
- Rule 1.15. Safekeeping Property: This rule requires lawyers to safeguard client property and to keep complete records of client funds and property. In the event of a lawyer's incapacity or death, the lawyer's executor or other representative must take steps to protect client property.
- Rule 1.16 Declining or Terminating Representation: This rule requires attorneys to take steps to protect their clients' interests when terminating representation. It includes the need to give reasonable notice to the client, returning client property, and refunding any unearned fees.
- Rule 1.17 Sale of Law Practice: This rule allows lawyers to sell their legal practice in the event of retirement, disability or death. However, they must take steps to assure that clients are notified of the sale and that the clients' interests are protected.
- Rule 1.18 Duties to Prospective Clients: Attorneys must protect the confidentiality of prospective clients and to avoid conflicts of interest. If an attorney becomes incapacitated or dies, they must take steps to ensure that the prospective clients' confidential information is protected.
- Rule 8.01 Duty to Report: Attorneys must report professional misconduct by other attorneys. If a lawyer becomes incapacitated or dies, and the person handling their files (representative and/or executor, as applicable) finds that the attorney committed malpractice, the representative and/or attorney must report that act to the bar.
- Rule 8.04 Misconduct: Lawyers are prohibited from engaging in certain types of misconduct, including dishonesty, fraud and misrepresentation. If an attorney becomes incapacitated or dies, their representative and/or executor may be required to report professional misconduct the attorney committed during their practice.
- Rule 8.05 Disciplinary Authority: If an attorney becomes incapacitated or dies, their representative and/or executor may be subject to disciplinary action if they fail to take steps to protect client interests.
In addition to these professional cannons, it is important to take practical steps to ensure a smooth transition in the event of incapacity or retirement. Practical steps include:
- Notifying clients.
- Assuring client confidentiality in the course of transitioning files.
- Notifying malpractice carriers and making decisions regarding whether or not to obtain tail coverage. An attorney's risk of being accused of malpractice extends well beyond their last day of practice. Tail coverage is the insurance policy term that may defend an attorney against claims by former clients.
- Terminating leases on office rentals.
Lawyers should be prepared for personal disaster, be it occasioned by death, disability, disappearance, or force of nature. For example, in Texas, an incapacitated person includes a minor under the age of 18, or any adult who is unable to provide for his or her own food, clothing, physical health, financial affairs, or need for shelter due to physical or mental condition. Moreover, a durable power of attorney may be triggered if two physicians certify that an individual lacks the cognitive ability to make decisions regarding their physical and/or financial needs. What might indicate to others that an attorney is incapacitated?
- Inability to understand and/or communicate with others.
- Issues with recognizing individuals and/or objects who were familiar to them.
- Inability to think and reason logically.
- Signs of hallucinations and/or delusional actions.
- Mood dysregulation.
- Inability to understand the consequences of one's actions, due to addiction, traumatic brain injury, or mental health issues.
Who can assist a lawyer in need?
- Law partners.
- The lawyer's guardian.
- The lawyer's executor.
- A colleague at another firm who has agreed to cover cases for the attorney.
- The lawyer's surviving spouse, if that spouse is also licensed to practice law.
- An attorney sent in by the appropriate state bar, appointed to supervise and/or wind down the practice.
- The individual who purchases the law practice.
Other considerations include:
- Slowing the flow by accepting fewer cases once the decision to retire.
- Communicating not only with clients, but with opposing counsel and the courts to communicate the change in responsibility on files.
- Taking into account tax issues. Certain state and federal tax returns may need to be filed.
- Selling the practice. Notice must be given, as may be required by the state bar.
What should a succession plan include?
A road map of where and how client files are stored (current and closed files).
- Bank information pertaining to operating accounts and client trust funds.
- Ledgers of accounts, including receivables, billing, and monies due to clients.
- An outline of monthly overhead, including accounting, property lease, utilities, payroll, and essential tax documents.
- Information regarding maintaining digital and/or physical files, IT coverage, and other applicable leases, such as copy machines and maintenance.
- Information regarding key collaterals such as an expert witness index, webpage access, passwords for internet accounts, etc.
The named successor should not be surprised by being so designated. The attorney should have the good sense to engage the successor in a dialogue about being trusted as to assume authority over the incapacitated/retired/deceased lawyer's practice. Just because one attorney in a practice has a succession plan, that should not relieve their colleagues of the need to address a succession plan as well. The successor needs to realize that even if there is ease of access at the firm, there is likely a need to run a check of appropriate county ledgers to ascertain what cases the attorney handled, as well as which cases are delineated as pending or closed.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllThe 'Biden Effect' on Senior Attorneys: Should I Stay or Should I Go?
9 minute readIdentify Future Leaders, Open Lines of Communication and Do It With Time to Spare: A Succession Planning Primer
6 minute readA Failure to Decentralize: A Messy 4 Months at Lewis Brisbois Has Roots in Belated Succession Planning
Trending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250