When parties seek to resolve disputes through voluntary mediation, there is a foundational assumption that the participating parties, and/or their representatives, have authority to participate in the mediation process, on their own behalf or on the behalf of another party. Further, there is a presumption that if a settlement is reached, the participating parties have the authority to enter into and execute a binding settlement agreement. They have voluntarily chosen to work with a neutral mediator to resolve their issues, they are motivated to find resolution, and any final agreement reflects a mutual decision to achieve closure.

But what happens if one of the parties is unable to understand the process, is not legally capable of entering into a contract, or otherwise does not have the capacity to participate in the process? How does the mediator traverse this complicated territory, and is any resulting settlement agreement enforceable?

Potential Concerns

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]