Reversing a lower court, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has vacated the settlement in a discrimination class action against the social media dating app Tinder, determining that the class’s representative had a strong interest in settling her claim because she had “no chance of going to trial” and failed to conduct “extensive discovery” related to the case.
On Tuesday, the federal appeals court unanimously reversed the district court’s revised class action settlement and held that plaintiff Lisa Kim was an inadequate class representative. Kim filed suit against Tinder in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California in April 2018 with claims that the online dating application violated the state’s Unruh Act and unfair competition law based on the company’s two-tiered pricing model reliant on the users’ age.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
